• Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lenin wasn’t a socialist. He was a transparently dishonest fraud who built a cult of personality. The best thing you can say is that he failed because if the results were a success, Lenin was a monster.

    • Juice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not how he was described by anyone who was alive at the time except for business men who lost their investments in tsarist Russia, but keep believing in spooky ghost stories.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A NATO-Anarchist, anti-Marxist, at least from what I gathered before they blocked me for defending Marx. Someone who stans Western Hegemony and constantly decries Marxists.

            Even Trotskyists like Lenin.

            • Lad@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              It was a serious question, but it seems you are unable to abstain from childish retorts.

              Not a tankie btw, not even a communist of any tendency

                • Lad@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Too cowardly to be upfront about your own politics huh? Doesn’t matter, you’ve already been identified as a liberal by someone you blocked for defending Marxism.

                  • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    That’s the most stereotypically tankie accusation I’ve ever read! 😂

                    They blocked me for defending “Marxism” (MLism isn’t actually Marxism) they must be a liberal! (Libertarian Socialism isn’t liberalism)

                    Or maybe they’re just lying. Tankies do that literally all the time.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        To the people downvoting this: please ask yourselves whether you’ve read anything Lenin wrote, or read any non-anticommunist article or book on the Russian Revolution and Lenin

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      While Lenin was a flawed leader, and did some shady shit in the name of revolution, I don’t think it’s fair or honest to call him a fraud. Man was literally imprisoned because of his beliefs. Not saying we should follow him religiously like some people do, he definitely made mistakes. Now if this was Stalin we were talking about I could understand.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        He was imprisoned for what he wrote about. His actions tell me that he was not a socialist, and that’s what matters. He held an election, immediately enacted violence to change the outcome, immediately dismantled the socialist power structures that were in place, purged people who didn’t agree with him, and acted as an autocrat.

        Anyone who thinks Lenin was a socialist is ignorant of history.

        Edit: I can’t actually see who replied to me because I blocked them 😂 tells me what I need to know about the people arguing with me.

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          immediately dismantled the socialist power structures that were in place

          That’s insanely ahistorical. The socialist power structures that were in place, existed precisely BECAUSE of Lenin and the Bolsheviks. And soviets had a very high degree of government control all the way up until the death of Lenin. You’re seriously mistaken about this

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Showing to us all you haven’t studied the figure of Lenin in an honest way in your life.

      Lenin dedicated most of his life (in exile from the tsarist regime for doing so) to study, write on, and agitate against, the issues of the masses. He was openly against becoming a personality cult, he maintained his democratic ideals until the moment a civil war broke and terrorist attacks started to kill members of the party and attempted to kill him, and if you read any of his writings it’s patently obvious that he’s obsessed with the well-being of the working class.