Lanusensei87@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 个月前New tech discoveredlemmy.worldimagemessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up11.63K
arrow-up11.63KimageNew tech discoveredlemmy.worldLanusensei87@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 5 个月前message-square97fedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up16·5 个月前Yeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”. The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging. But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT
minus-squareel_abuelo@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 个月前Is it just me or is this a really weird way of repeating what the OP said? He even used the duck emoji for clarity…
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 个月前Removed by mod
minus-squarePissipissini Johnson 🩵! :D@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 个月前Removed by mod
Yeah, it’s a well known technique in programming called “rubber duck debugging”.
The process of explaining the situation forces you to think about it in a different way, which can help you with the debugging.
But, nobody actually credits the duck when it works. It’s weird that this guy seems to want to credit ChatGPT
Is it just me or is this a really weird way of repeating what the OP said? He even used the duck emoji for clarity…
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod