• Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    That’s not really a good take though. You don’t need to be intelligent or social to be worthy of the moral consideration to not be eaten. Otherwise we’d be eating babies.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, that doesn’t logically follow. Nobody said it’s the one, singular consideration.

      You’re comparing a species of animal (whale) to the age of an animal (baby). Two completely different things…

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              No because you don’t understand that humans are animals, for one… But more importantly, because of the nature of your comments in this thread. It’s weird behavior.

                • prole
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  I didn’t say animals are human, i said humans are animals.

                  Can you really not grasp the distinction?

                  And oh yeah I know I’m weird lol