Coming from a district court, I think this ruling could be appealed, but it’s welcome news nevertheless.

  • leds@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    never voluntarily unlock it anywhere close to the border.

    Isn’t that defined as 100 mile from the border (including international airports)

    • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      I believe it’s 100 miles from the border including coastlines but does not include a 100 mile radius around international airports. I don’t remember the source but Ive seen a map that represented it that way.

      Also worth noting, this ruling only benefits citizens in that specific district, as other districts aren’t bound by its rulings. Personally I’d recommend having a 2nd device you can use to record your interactions because if they violate your rights your chances of getting their body cam video of it aren’t great.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        To add, the Great Lakes count as coastline because you can navigate to an international boarder from any of them. That’s how you cover the vast majority of the US population with this loophole.