Micro- and nano-scopic sized pieces of plastic people use everyday can eventually find its way into the most unlikely of places, even in the plaque of clogged arteries of cardiac patients, a recent study found.
“If microplastics might be promoting coronary disease, you might not be able to avoid ingesting the microplastics, because they’re everywhere, but you can sure do the other things. You can keep your blood pressure low. You can exercise. You can get your cholesterol measured,” Gerber said.
That’s what this study from last March says (see link in the description):
This just shows the plastic is found in the arterial plaque,
not that the plastic has a toxic effect on the body.EDIT: The article in question did find a correlation with the presence of microplastics in the plaque and worse health outcomes compared to those without microplastics detected in their plaque:
I totally could be wrong, but I thought when they discover microplastics cause some kind of health condition that would be huge news.
Searching around, I found this article talking about the known toxic effects of additives like BPA: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7920297/
But I don’t think that demonstrates the toxicity of microplastics accumulating in the body.
This article had more promising citations to follow-up on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microplastics_effects_on_human_health
Looks like I misread your question.
My understanding is that the title defines plastic as toxic in general. In the article there is another link from EPA which
Right, but PFAS isn’t even plastic, it’s a chemical used as a coating to make things like take-out containers waterproof. PFAS is its own environmental catastrophe, but it doesn’t relate to whether microplastics are toxic.
Plastic itself isn’t toxic, in fact plastic is biochemically inert (not a source, but further reading on Wikipedia). Various additives to plastic have been shown to be toxic, but those are less relevant to discussions of accumulating microplastics in the body.
Some contexts would be more likely to have negative health impact from microplastics, like when there are larger particles of plastic in the air that factory workers get in their lungs, maybe those particles could cause mechanical damage to the lungs that lead to cancers or other conditions.
That is speculative, and it shows we need more studies to find ways that microplastics impact health, but the title is a little misleading characterizing plastics as toxic in the context of microplastics in arterial plaque, since that is not demonstrated to pose a health risk (even if we all agree it is concerning and may pose some kind of health risk we aren’t yet aware of).