Hollywood’s video game performers voted to go on strike Thursday, throwing part of the entertainment industry into another work stoppage after talks for a new contract with major game studios broke down over artificial intelligence protections. 

The strike — the second for video game voice actors and motion capture performers under the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists — will begin at 12:01 a.m. Friday. The move comes after nearly two years of negotiations with gaming giants, including divisions of Activision, Warner Bros. and Walt Disney Co., over a new interactive media agreement.

SAG-AFTRA negotiators say gains have been made over wages and job safety in the video game contract, but that the studios will not make a deal over the regulation of generative AI. Without guardrails, game companies could train AI to replicate an actor’s voice, or create a digital replica of their likeness without consent or fair compensation, the union said.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I fully support them, but it is a sad irony that the dystopian cyberpunk stories they told are starting to come true, and they are probably the protagonists.

    What would JC Denton do?

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What makes you think they would? I might be considered that by some and I don’t want AI used in place of real actors because human actors bring something unique to their performances an AI never could. If the actor agrees to allow an AI mimic due to scheduling problems for ADR or whatever, they should get paid every cent they would’ve been if they’d recorded it themselves.

      Maybe I’m not AI Bro enough to be on the wrong side of this.

      • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are many types of AI Bros. They can be researchers who like to explore and develop the potential of AI, others who like to see AI-related research and like to explain how AI works to people who are not into the subject. Finally, there are those who say you can make money with a few steps or by doing nothing.

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          And I mean the latter. Just like Tech Bros and NFT Bros being in it just for the easy money while disregarding the potential damage.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          others who like to see AI-related research and like to explain how AI works to people who are not into the subject

          This. And I’m fairly out of step with the zeitgeist as far as AI “plagerism” goes.

          But I don’t think AI is a replacement for an actual human, nor do I think it should be. Or could be. It’s a toy. It’s a tool, but it is not a product because it is inherently unreliable and inferior, and given the limitations of the current technology I believe it always will be - at least until they build something completely different from the current technology.

    • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, this strike only affects the video game industry in the United States. The video game industries in other countries are still going and can use AI in development, we just have to see how this plays out in the future.

      For example, in the future, if American actors decide to participate in Chinese or Indian video games and they use AI, they will have to accept the terms that the developer wants in their project or let someone else take their role.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yup. It’ll also be handy knowing that you’ll never have an AI actor get “cancelled” for whatever random reason might come along.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Main voices and significant side characters of the story, I agree. But for some random NPCs that just add to the ambience of the environment, I think A.I can fill those roles. It just would be too cost prohibitive to hire actors for every single character voice. The developers would just not do it or they just repeat the same dialogue over and over again and that gets monotonous.

    I say this as a writer who also used to work in videogames.

    • Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Aren’t those minor roles exactly how people get their start in voice acting and start building up their resumes? Actors have to have a place to get their start, too.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m not talking about what is currently available. I’m talking about the future in gaming. Worlds are growing. You can’t have like 5,000 unique actors in a game world… nor dialogue being written for all of them. The amount of dialogue writers would have to come up with is astronomical.

        There will be games where you’ll go to full restaurant and walk around various tables where they’re will be dialogue that means nothing to the story but adds to the environment. Or just random people walking down the street.

        Then there will be times where a small side character you approach will give you a side mission… those are the ones you’ll want live actors for.

        Game companies will lose money if they had to pay everyone for what the future holds.

        Or the alternative would be… They just wouldn’t do it. Same amount of jobs are created. Probably fewer jobs as you wouldn’t need to test as much.

        • Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’m not talking about what is currently available. I’m talking about the future in gaming.

          So am I. Where are the future voice actors who wolud voice the major roles going to come from if the jobs they depend on to start out and get their foot in the door/build up their resumes at the beginning of their careers are gone?

          • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            The same voice jobs they do now. I am not taking about those type of jobs. And actors should fight for those. I’m talking about where the future of video games are headed.

            It will be impossible to do with actors. I don’t care how many voices they can do. It will be impossible to do with writers too. There will just be too much to write.

            People just can’t say… AI = bad. It’s a losing battle.

          • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The government could provide subsidies or tax exemptions to companies that do not use AI in films, series, audios and video games.

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              It seems likely that AI will become so ubiquitous that we’d have to start drawing arbitrary lines. Can I use a picture on a wall on a live set that was drawn by AI? Can I use AI to sync an actor’s lips to an ADR line change? How much AI crosses the line?

              I’m just not sure this genie can be put back in the bottle. That said, human art is better. Human acting is better. Human writers are better. I feel like overuse of AI will show in the quality of the product.

              The question is are Netflix and Bethesda going to fill their catalog with AI garbage because it’s cheap and audiences don’t care anyway? I go to the PS store and look at the human made garbage on there for $.50, and I think maybe. Maybe enough people don’t care about quality of the product if it’s cheap enough. But I don’t think so.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Next up writers being replaced by AI, because all that side content is just tedious and expensive to write for being just random stuff.

      Good luck with that stance then.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree. That will also need to happen. It’s impossible for writers to write what will be needed in the future of gaming.

        Imagine something like GTA where you are able to enter any building and any room within it and there will be NPCs in most of them. How are you going to write for all of that, never mind act?

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Making a simple scene requires the making of models and background or environment. The environment has to be made separately. A model requires the actual 3d models geometry, rigging (in order for the geometry to move), textures to give the model a surface, and an animator which blocks the movement frame by frame. Then you’d also need someone exclusively animating the camera, and depending on the production pipeline a different process of making special effects and shaders to treat the illumination and materials. Some of these parts can be made by the same person but usually, specially in high quality productions, a different highly trained specialist will handle each part separately. Each is an art form that requires lots of education, skills and hours of labor to make.

          For instance, the most recent spider man animated film, Across the Spider-Verse, took roughly 5 years to produce. For contrast, Snow White, the first animated film took roughly 4 years to make. Just because something is computer animated doesn’t mean it was easier or took less time to make. Most computer animators receive training in classical 2d animation, as most basic skills and principles are transferrable. Also, most 3d animated films today include a lot of digital 2d work to achieve the artists desired vision.

          • radivojevic@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            i think you must have misinterpreted my comment and its meaning.

            I was referring to hand drawn animation… like, Snow White from 1937.

    • Samvega
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Decades ago, Hand drawn animators go on strike

      Decades hence, you will still messed up tense in your writing.