Kamala Harris has launched her campaign for the White House, after President Joe Biden stepped aside Sunday under pressure from party leaders.

The vice president has Biden’s endorsement, and is unchallenged as yet for the Democratic nomination, which will be formally decided at the Aug. 19 convention in Chicago.

“I am honored to have the President’s endorsement and my intention is to earn and win this nomination,” Harris said in a statement. “I will do everything in my power to unite the Democratic Party—and unite our nation—to defeat Donald Trump and his extreme Project 2025 agenda. We have 107 days until Election Day. Together, we will fight. And together, we will win.”

In her statement, the vice president paid tribute to Biden’s “extraordinary leadership,” saying he had achieved more in one term than many presidents do in two.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Agreed with all that! But I have one caveat.

    the most favorable moment in our country’s history for a non-white, non-male person to become president

    Look, I cried tears of joy when Obama won. I mean that literally. But guess when the conservative hate machine got dialed to 11?

    Some will say it started earlier, but I disagree. Back then I occasionally listened to Limbaugh and Hannity on the radio while running errands at work. They actually had some sane takes now and again. Wasn’t very political, but I had my ear to the ground. The entire machine, especially Fox News, went so far off the rails in response to a black President, I simply couldn’t listen to any of them, not for a second.

    Conservative brains take time to assimilate new social conditions, gotta chip away at 'em. I’m already hearing the, “Fuck them!” replies, but that doesn’t change the fact that these people exist and vote. And they’re going to get more and more violent.

    Look at LGBT rights. We got them to begrudgingly accept gay marriage. Fresh off that victory, liberals asked for more and more acceptance. Too much, too fast, they went full-on berserk. Now I feel gay rights are perhaps worse than before.

    Scared to see what a double-whammy of a black woman does to their brains. I used to laugh about conservatives choking on their outrage, same with Christians. “Ha! Losing ain’t ya!” But now it isn’t so funny. They’re in a corner and lashing out. What next?

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      4 months ago

      All, or at least the vast majority, of those people you’re talking about are already Trump voters. They’re going to continue backing Trump no matter who the Democratic party picks. They saw a black guy get elected president, and that radicalized them. They aren’t coming back. Pandering to the imaginary demographic of racists who will surely see the light if we elect the right candidate is simply a losing proposition.

      Will there be right wing violence in response to a Harris presidency? Of course there will be. Is there right wing violence now? Of course there is. I understand that you’re tired of hearing the “fuck them” replies, but seriously: fuck them. They are a cancer on this nation. Holding back on doing something good just because you’re afraid that the fucking awful people you share a country with will do something awful just means that you never make any progress.

    • ImADifferentBird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      The thing is, they’ve already turned the hate machine up to 11. There’s not much farther they can go than here.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Too much, too fast, they went full-on berserk.

      Raises a conundrum I struggle with:

      No one should have to wait for rights, true.

      yet

      Idiots vote, true.

      How should we act if we know fighting for certain rights means fascists have an easier time in elections?

      Should we…:

      A. Be publicly on the right side of history at risk of losing an election to the detriment of all.

      B. Be publicly on the wrong side of a human rights issue in order to win, then try to privately backchannel to make up for the sin.

      (Perhaps a false binary here, so ready to be corrected.)

      Idealist in me says fight at all costs, maybe it’ll work out. Pragmatist in me says “win the damn election & backchannel the heck out of your term.” Feel guilty either way.

      Edit: corrected word to “wrong” from “right”