I’d like to thank the admins for being so open and direct about the issues that they’re facing.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And “serverless” functions are a trap.

    How are serverless functions a trap? They seem like a great cheap option for simple CRUD / client > server > db apps (what most apps end up being).

    • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anything that is “cheap” to do on serverless is cheaper to do on a $5 droplet, especially once it starts to grow.

      Serverless gets you to buy in to a vendors lock-in.

      • Phoenixbouncing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure that that’s an apples to apples comparison. A droplet looks more akin to Aws lightsail than lambda, and lambda certainly doesn’t start at $5 a month.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting, I’ll check out droplets, but in my experience with Azure Functions there’s not much vendor lock in. My API was just a normal Node.js / express server, the only part that was locked in to Azure Functions was the format for the endpoint definitions, but those can be adjusted in like an hour’s worth of time to anything else