• Riccosuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    But I doubt this will swing many voters.

    Then you are incredibly historically naive. He was already winning by every available metric. So, if nothing had changed at all there was already an extremely high likelihood of him being reelected. This only serves to further strengthen his chances.

    I don’t think people really understand how stupid, brainwashed, and weak minded the average American truly is. There are plenty of people who will vote for him because surviving an assassination attempt makes him look strong. Count on it.

    • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 months ago

      He was already winning by every available metric.

      I just looked for myself, and NPR/PBS survey has Biden ahead. Many other polls have it basically tied. A few have Trump in the lead by 2-3 points.

      I wouldn’t personally call that winning by every available metric, although I would agree with you that it looks like Trump has a slight lead.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Were those national popular vote polls? If so, you have to factor in the electoral advantage Republicans have. If the national popular vote is tied, Republicans will win.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Individual polls are meaningless. I only care about the trends of the the aggregate polling. Five Thirty Eight has had Trump leading by an average of 2 points in aggregate polling basically from the beginning. There has never been a time where Biden was ahead during this election cycle. Therefore, using the available metrics it is clear that Donald Trump is on the path to returning to the White House.

    • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You could make points without calling the other person naive. No need to make the internet a worse place.

      As far as “every available metric” goes, you’re talking polls, and polls are garbage. Every poll had Clinton winning in late October 2016.

      And we’re in an unprecedented portion of politics in American history, so bringing up historical measurements doesn’t convince me like you think it would.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We will see who did the proper analysis in 4 months time. I’m really hoping it won’t be me. Unfortunately, I am also certain that I am correct.

        • kn0wmad1c@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m not certain at all, which scares me all the same. Tho the last ten years still hasn’t beaten the hope out of me, so I’ve got that much going.

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I don’t want to kill your hope. I don’t share it, but maybe you can muster enough for both of us.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yes, I guess we will find out if you’re the world’s only legitimate soothsayer with an outcome you’ve predicted that has 50/50 odds of coming true.

              • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s not how odds work. The fact there are only two outcomes does not mean the odds of each of those outcomes occurring is the same…

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Yes, the braindead thing you’re saying you can predict the future. As a remotely reasonable person, I dispute this laughable idea.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Lol exactly, no one knows the future. That’s the problem with inductive reasoning and the philosophical idea of the absurd.