maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1204cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1204external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmaegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square73fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnews@radiation.party
minus-squaremaegul (he/they)@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoI did not know this story! Thanks! Important precedent it seems in framing a foundation of scepticism.
minus-squareGamma@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoUnfortunately it’s a 3 part (~2.5 hour) series, but I thought it was worth the time. Definitely made me wary on the topic LOL
I did not know this story! Thanks! Important precedent it seems in framing a foundation of scepticism.
Unfortunately it’s a 3 part (~2.5 hour) series, but I thought it was worth the time. Definitely made me wary on the topic LOL