• Tiltinyall@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      The funniest part is that researchers still can’t figure out how to disengage from generations old bias of what constitutes a simple relationship.

    • Sertro@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s rather a wrong use of the words they feature.

      Presented questions like "During the time you and [partner’s initials] have/had a sexual relationship, have/did you ever have any other sexual partners?” are not about that, and are indeed heavily limited to monogamy perspective.

      You can be in a polygamous relationship, but, unless you previously agreed to have free sexual contacts outside your group, doing so with someone else without everyone’s notice and agreement is still absolutely cheating.

      Having sex with several partners in a predetermined arrangement is obviously not cheating.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Intimacy” is used as a euphemism for sex, bruh.

      Passion and intimacy were not associated with infidelity. This suggests that the quality and frequency of sex or emotional closeness alone do not necessarily deter infidelity.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not. The article says they surveyed intimacy with the question "How close are you to your partner?”

        I’m sure the actual study says more. Usually the questions about sex are directly about sex, unless the surveyor is very uptight.