• Shitgenstein1@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 个月前

    Christ, there’s so much backstory here - just scrolling through long descriptions of Gerard’s views and just thinking “based, based, based, based.”

    • self@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 个月前

      Sandifer had been busy during her time away from Wikipedia, writing an essay collection titled Neoreaction: A Basilisk. Five of the self-published book’s six essays (about ants, TERFS, Trump, the Austrian School, and Peter Thiel) were forgotten the day they were written. The sixth is Gerard’s masterwork. Sandifer starts the essay with quick critical overviews of Eliezer Yudkowsky, Curtis Yarvin, and Nick Land, then goes on a sprawling journey from William Blake to John Milton, with stops at Fanon, Debord, Butler, and Coates. This review describes the experience well. I can only describe it as leftist free association based on the prompt “Say whatever comes to mind, inspired by David Gerard’s obsession with Roko’s Basilisk and neoreaction combined with your own love of leftist theory.”

      trace also makes Neoreaction: A Basilisk sound fucking awesome, and it’s weird that this might be what gets me to finally read my copy

      • flavia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        That review that he links to is not even very fond of Yudkowsky. They say they have a sort of “yes, and” response to Sandifer’s book but TW probably interpreted it as “yes, but” and slurped it up to have some sort of criticism to the book. Makes me wonder how many posts that elaborate a bit on their opinions he even read. Or maybe he got confused whose book was being talked about.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 个月前

        iirc Yud and lesswrong is also more of a sidenote in that essay, as the thing is about Neoreaction. A think Yud used to be not that a fan of (and that might even be in the essay itself). Perhaps the shift in attitudes towards LW can also be explained because they are more and more accepting of things like NRx and the line between them is made less and less clear. For example see this article esp the part about neoreaction a basilisk ;).

        • YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          5 个月前

          Honestly, anyone who read the essay can see that the question of whether Yud approves is totally irrelevant to its thesis, but these people are incapable of reading styles of argument that don’t proceed by declarative statements about binary choices, except of course in those situations where something precious to them (such as their good standing at the “not a racist” club) might by at stake

      • Evinceo@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 个月前

        The article on GamerGate is also awesome, but my favorite part is probably that it contains the very best article about Trump you’re ever going to read.

    • wndy@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 个月前

      based, based, based, based

      This is the exact sentiment that got me to finally make an account here. I stopped following after y’all left Reddit but this post sucked me back in. So… there’s that?

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 个月前

      If DG were any more based, he’d be a ziggurat.

      Also, tracingwoodgrains spilling 10k words about their heroes getting bagged on by sneerclub is the platonic ideal of “a kicked dog yelps.”