• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    4 months ago

    Or…

    The president can just order the DOJ to imprison him for actions against the US government and outright treason.

    And it would be totally legal

    But he won’t, because he doesn’t take the threat of fascism serious.

    • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Joe Biden is acting like a complete pussy following milquetoast Merrick’s lead

    • ProIsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      Toss him in jail for one day and you’d see all this shit stop.

      Add the owner of fox in the same cell. You’d be amazed how quickly things would clean themselves up.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Took one bullet to stop 1/6.

        Fascists are usually cowards, but they’ll always keep pushing till there’s consequences.

        Biden will not fucking give them consequences. They gave him the power to, and dude immediately announced publicly that he’d never do it.

        Like, that alone should be disqualifying.

        Biden treats this personal, it’s him vs trump. But this is so much bigger and so much more important than either of those old rich men.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don’t believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn’t a regular part of the president’s duty.

      The best king example I’ve seen is that the president would be within the law if they shot the director of homeland security - the president is allowed to control who is in that position, they can remove them at will - the SC ruling means that the method they chose to remove that person is now unimpeachable… if they chose to suspend them by freeing them of their mortal coil they’re “acting within official duties”.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t believe the recent court ruling would actually allow that because suspending court justices isn’t a regular part of the president’s duty.

        Directing the DOJ is

        So Biden can direct them to arrest someone, and throw them in gitmo.

        His motivations can’t be investigated. And directing the DOJ is within a presidents power

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          It might be illegal for the DOJ personnel to follow that order, but he can just tell them he’ll pardon them for any crimes they’re charged with for following his order and that he’ll murder them if they don’t follow his order, and all of that is totally legal

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            4 months ago

            It might be illegal

            But we’ll never know, because looking into his motivations is literally forbidden.

            All he can be tried for is the action in a vacuum. And if it was explicitly within his powers. He’s good

            Literally anything that goes thru an agency is automatically cool.

            That’s why it’s so dangerous to half ass this election and for Biden to just ignore all the power he has.

          • NegativeNull@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            The president can pardon people for unspecified things (proven by Trump). He can pardon anyone for “following orders”

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 months ago

    We knew he was a garbage human being during the Anita Hill hearings.

    That he’s still a garbage human being now that he had even more power shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone with any understanding of how people work.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      We knew he was a garbage human being during the Anita Hill hearings

      Man, if only the head of that committee was a real leader. One willing to stand up for what is right, defend the victim, keep decorum, and allow the multiple other woman with similar complaints to testify…

      Imagine if Clarance could have been kept off the court

      I guess it would be pointless to look up who that was, it was 30 years ago and the Senator would have already been pretty senior to head that committee…

      I’m sure he’s far a way from modern politics by now, hell, he’d have to be like 81 years old now!

      No reason to disturb his likely retirement enjoying his time with his family.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I vividly remember a newspaper clipping about the Anita Hill hearings being displayed at my school in 10th grade. If only I knew that POS would not only still be there 33 years later, but would be actively trying to destroy democracy.

  • xploit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    How has nobody offered him a yacht holiday and then extracted the ship’s crew in the middle of nowhere in Pacific.
    That would be pretty hilarious

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    or what? the house is in complete chaos with people who dont know how (or care) to be congress critters, and what, theyre suppose to act on whatever the DOJ finds??

    waste of time and money

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      waste of time and money

      Yes and no. Regardless of what happens with the results, it’s important that we not let [blatant] corruption become the norm. Better to try to do the right thing than let that kind of corruption go completely unchallenged.

      And if the R-led House ignores it, that puts them on the record as saying that corruption is okay. If dems take the House, then an impeachment vote might at least make it to the floor. Ideally, we’d have the 60 votes in the Senate needed to do something with that, but I’m not holding my breath.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Remember shit like this? In hindsight they’re so tragically pathetic. “The walls are closing in on Trump!”

        • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, there’s plenty of Mueller Report toilet paper to go around, lol. And if we eventually run out, we’ll likely have the results from this probe to last us through the next 3 pandemics.