A projection of how the election results would look if we used Additional Member System (AMS), like in Scotland and Wales.

Party AMS FPTP Seat change
Labour 236 411 +175
LibDems 77 71 -6
Green 42 4 -38
SNP 18 9 -9
Plaid Cymru 4 4 0
Reform 94 5 -89
Conservative 157 121 -36
Northern Ireland 18 18 0
Other 4 6 +2
  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just had a brief look at AMS on Wikipedia but I’m struggling to understand it. They say it’s less proportional than MMP as used in New Zealand and Germany, but the brief description of how AMS works sounded very much like how MMP works. What’s the difference?

    • flamingos-cant@feddit.ukOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      From Wikipedia:

      Modified version of MMP referred to as the additional-member system, with the number of constituency seats a party won being taken into account when calculating proportional seat

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The less intuitive the system is, the less empowered the voters feel, and the more the system will be gamed. And all voting systems can be gamed.