• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sexist enough that a woman who no one likes won the popular vote in 2016. …

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Popular vote dont get you shit here.

        She lost the race in swing states where “independents” choose the winner. If she had been “John Clinton,” with every single bit of the politcal baggage and none of the sexist baggage, I guarantee she would have cleared that 80k vote hurdle in those 3 states.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Not if her statements and Goldman Sachs relationship were as public as they are. Goldman and Chase are political kryptonite for anyone on the left.

          Goldman killed Warren in 2020.

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think people underestimate how much the Clinton name helped her even when the sexism hurt her. Beyond maybe Michelle Obama now, I can’t think of any other woman out there likely to perform as well as Hilary did. During the race, I heard more than one person make comments along the lines of “If she’s in trouble, she can just call her husband”. She definitely got a lot more points from the Clinton name than she lost for being a woman. It’s a sad world sometimes, yall.

        I personally think Bill Clinton’s brother Roger could have won that race even with all his controversies and the fact that he has zero qualifications.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          She lost due to her connections.

          Her speaking engagements cost her important votes in key states.

          If the left wants to win Goldman and Chase are Kryptonite.

      • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I remember the conservatives I worked with hated H. Clinton for “wanting to take our guns away.” I told her (it was a white 20 year old girl I was talking to specifically in this group) that whole idea is untrue.

        Clinton didn’t lose because of her horrible treatment of Africans, her philosophy that abortion should be a states’ right issue, because she is a woman, etc. She lost because the “Dems want our guns” propaganda. Conservatives are a simple breed.

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The only color that matters is blue. I will never vote a cop for president.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          You do you, but I will write in Jill Stine first. Dems are only my first pick if their pick is viable. Putting up a Cop in the current climate is asking to lose.

          Only Republicans can promote LE and expect them to win right now.

          • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you’ll misspell a write-in vote for an idiotic Russian plant. Sounds like you’re really someone to listen to on this.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      RN, Biden is still the best odds at beating Trump by the sheer fact that he’s the incumbent. Why do you think all of the rightmost Dems and the Russian shills are hopping aboard the replacement train? Because they want Trump to win.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, unfortunately, there’s a calculus here that isn’t entirely clear. The right-wing, the accelerationists, and the Russian shills are all on board with this because they THINK it’s a losing proposition for the Democrats. However, whether it is ACTUALLY a losing proposition is… uncertain.

        We live in a fucked-up political era. I think a replacement could go either way. I’m not thrilled about the idea, but we’re rolling the dice either way, so I’m not going to let either outcome change my disposition much. What I know is that I’m voting against fascism this November, and anyone who expresses doubts as to whether THEY’RE voting against fascism are, at best, useful idiots for fascism, and at worst, fascists who are too cowardly to admit it.

        • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I mean, in a vacuum, there’s lots of people who I’d like to be running for president as the DNC candidate instead of Biden. However, I’m not advocating for that right now, because I think it would be a tactical mistake.

          Edit: on that note, there’s also a whole lot of people who I’d want to run as the GOP candidate instead of Trump as well. One of them is Biden. 😂

          • kaffiene@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah OK, I respect the position that it could be a tactical mistake. But people suggesting that it might not be are not automatically Russian shills. Maybe cool the reactionary rhetoric

            • raynethackery@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Your tactical mistake leads to existential problems for some of us. As a gay man, Trump and the GOP winning this election is threat to my life and the lives of my brothers and sisters. Go ahead and say I’m being alarmist but everyone said the same thing about Roe vs Wade being overturned.

              • kaffiene@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                you’re making a very large strawman. Suggesting that a different strategy for the Dems might be more effective is not in any way suggesting that electing Trump is a good idea.

            • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Maybe cool the reactionary rhetoric

              You confused the statement with its converse.

              “If you are X, then you’ll hop aboard the Biden replacement train”

              does not imply

              “If you hop aboard the Biden replacement train, then you are X”

              Understand? This is a common error and is known as “affirming the consequent”. I never made the statement that you assumed I had.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        sigh

        . . . Ok.

        If Whitmer’s all-in and everyone super swears she can be a charming candidate for two months, fine. I want it noted my preference is Whitmer/AOC but I appreciate the optics.

        Goddammit. If it gets us a reprieve from diseased lunatics for four years, fine.

  • flyingjake@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Biden should straight up resign and hand over power to Kamala now. That would short circuit the nomination process and completely undercut any argument that she’s not up for the job if it’s no longer hypothetical and she’s actually just rocking it IRL.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      America is sexist as fuck. Just having a woman running for President will cost the Dems more “independents” than Biden ever will.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          Who are voting Trump/conservative. Not for her.

          She is blue to the left and black to the right.

          She is unelectable.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Rocking it” for a few months? Everyone will just say she’s coasting in Biden’s admin.

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        I disagree. I am not a newsom fan because I’m a progressive. I’m from SF and endured him since he was mayor here. But I believe he would absolutely create a higher turnout than Biden or Kamala. He would do a great job debating Trump, and rhetorically punching back at Republican talking points. Which is something Democrats and never trumpers crave desperately.

    • Xerø@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t think black women will vote for that American Psycho looking motherfucker.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    CNN is a fucking joke. They literally want the Dems to crash and burn, so take any of their “advice and opinion” with a few metric tons of salt.

  • jumjummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    So is this the new Russian disinformation strategy? We loved on from Genocide Joe to let’s switch out. Iden?

    Not going to happen, and I doubt any other candidate could do better at this point of the election cycle.

    I already see our local Russian trolls spouting this bullshit.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      This attitude that any criticism of Biden is from Russian trolls is getting a little tiresome. And childish

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re right, not just Russian Trolls, but wannabe fascists and naive fools here in the US. Anyone who doesn’t see the absolute disaster that Trump will be, and instead “BoTh SiDeS” things or uses “GeNoCiDe JoE” is just an absolute fool.

        • kaffiene@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s a hell of a jump. Suggest that we could do better than Biden and youre a fascist, a fool and a Trump supporter. Seriously, grow up. This is no way to discuss issues

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            Were there better candidates than Biden? Absolutely. Can we realistically expect any of them to jump in now and have a chance of winning? Absolutely not.

            There’s a big difference, especially when you look at the realities of the situation. If you don’t believe me, name a candidate that would have a stronger chance than Biden now.

            Come November, when it’s between Biden and Trump, any vote not going to Biden is helping fascisim.

            • kaffiene@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’d go for Elizabeth Warren. If it were possible right now, AOC. Also Bernie Sanders. Anyway, I’m not saying you’re wrong: I genuinely don’t know. What offends me is calling people who think another strategy might be better, fascists or Russian shills.

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Was Biden looking like warmed over death a week ago Russia disinformation too? Or should I not trust my lying eyes?

  • Jessica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    Sorry rest of the country, but we’d like to keep Big Gretch to ourselves. K Thx

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Haven’t heard of her,but Gretch sounds like the stronger side of the ticket based on the thread.

      • Jessica
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        She’s cool enough to have a song made for her. I don’t know what that means, but…I’m not sure where I’m going with this lol

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d rather see Whitmer and AOC, personally. Harris is disliked from both sides. I can’t see her being an option. She has a 39% approval rating. She’s even lower than Biden.

    As much as I’d like to see another candidate replace Biden, it’s too late in the game and Americans are generally idiots. They’ll screw things up this late into the battle and Trump will win.

    As much as I hate to admit it, Biden is probably the best path forward … Which gives me acid reflux a little bit to say, but the idea of Trump being president makes me want to jump off a bridge, so I’ll take a couple antacids and hope for a better choice in 2028.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unfortunately, removing Harris from the ticket doesn’t have the best optics in a lot of scenarios.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    WHAT PART DO THEY NOT UNDERSTAND: There’s no changing the nominee at this point because they can’t be put on the ballots in multiple states. Stop the bullshit.

    The only reason this is even a question is that liberals are willing to consider the age problem; with Trump you have the age problem, the fascism problem (proj 2025), the insanity problem (shark batteries), the sex offender problem, and so, so, so many others.

    Get it together.

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-joe-biden-presidential-race-replacing-biden-georgia-nevada-wisconsin-1919531

    NEVADA GEORGIA WISCONSIN

    Come on you cowards, don’t just downvote, tell me how losing ALL of those states is anything but an automatic loss?