• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nah, human ideology is much broader than a single economic system. The fact that people who live under capitalism can’t understand this just shows the power of indoctrination.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        What you’re saying is that you’re not self aware enough to realize that you have an ideology. Everyone has a world view that they develop to understand how the world works, and every world view necessarily represents a simplification of reality. Forming abstractions is how our minds deal with complexity.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Do you think people should be treated with respect? Do you think there should be consideration for your condition so you are not exempt from certain events, activities, opportunities?

            These are matters of ideology. If you say yes to it, it is ideological in the same way when you say no to it. There is no inherent objective truth to these value questions.

            Same for the economy. It doesn’t matter if you think that growth should be the main objective, or that equal opportunity should be the focus or sustainability or other things. You will have to make a value judgement and the sum of these values represent your ideology.

            • Samvega
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              There is no inherent objective truth to these value questions.

              I disagree. These values are based on objective observations.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Observations may be objective, but the values are always subjective. Two different people can look at the same set of facts and come to entirely different conclusions of what constitutes desirable actions based on their world view.

                • Samvega
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Two different people can disagree on whether a table is a table: this does not alter objective fact.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    You entirely missed the point of what I said. Two different people can agree on an objective fact that a table is a table, but disagree on whether it’s a good looking table.

                • Samvega
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The idea that objectivity requires a God figure would seem to me to be Berkeleyan idealism.