• SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s food serving legislation being taken too far. The clothes I think are fine, but since they’re not inspected by the health department like a restaurant the government can technically shut it down which is complete bullshit.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      No, the Good Samaritan Act says free food doesn’t have to be inspected as long as it’s given “in good faith apparently wholesome food or apparently fit grocery products to a nonprofit organization for ultimate distribution to needy individuals”

      https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2020/08/13/good-samaritan-act-provides-liability-protection-food-donations

      All fifty states and the District of Columbia have additional food donation statues that limit food donor’s liability—these currently vary widely, such as by who (i.e., donors, nonprofit organizations), and what foods and food products are covered.

      state laws may provide greater protection against liability, but not less

      • SendPicsofSandwiches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        Anecdotally, I don’t think so. I used to do some work with a place that did a lot of charity work and would get together bi-weekly to talk about travel and have a banquet. The banquet was always prepared and served in accordance with the law, and there were often tons of leftovers. So we would give the leftovers to the homeless. The health department fined us because we weren’t allowed to serve food outside of our establishment.