• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        5 months ago

        You could find out the context by reading the title of the thread, but then you’d have less to bitch about, so I can understand why you chose ignorance.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hmm. I just read the github thread that this is about. The devs made a mistake on this; but it seems to me that there is a bit of an over-reaction here. The people in the thread seem to be discussing it calmly and politely; and the issue (i.e. use of pronouns in the build instructions) ends up being resolved. By contrast, the reaction outside of the actual thread… is extreme.

      Like I said, this seems like an overreaction to someone making a mistake of ignorance & indifference. It wasn’t an act of malice.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why don’t ya’ll contribute some meaningful code instead of finding ways to deny those who do

      • wholookshere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Please describe to me how someone who offered up changes to change “he” to “they” for them, and then the contributor getting pissy about “politics” is denying work.

    • quissberry@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, I saw this, and all my excitement for the project died. If it becomes successful, I might use it anyway though.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      they must be trying to go after the brave marketshare