• Daisyifyoudo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. People already existed here, the Vikings visited first (and most say the Irish too), Columbus didn’t “discover” shit. Only thing he did was rape, pillage, and enslave. And we have a holiday dedicated to him…

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And as incredible as it may sound, all of that pales in comparison to the diseases they brought and spread.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        And we have a holiday dedicated to him…

        It’s a running theme in our species: memorializing awful people for the sake of tradition.

      • AntifaNI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Columbus didn’t “discover” shit.

        Prior to 1492 the Americas were populated by people completely unaware of their own existence.

    • FizzlePopBerryTwist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      TL;DW - There are carvings, stories, genetic evidence, linguistic evidence, and historical accounts that collectively support the idea that contact by the Irish (and maybe other Europeans) occurred 1000 years before Columbus and this dude in Galway knew about it from trying and then might have been in cahoots with Columbus to go there, but Columbus took all the credit as an “accidental” discovery.