• SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can you solve the equation?

    Homelessness becomes illegal + For-profit prison system that’s allowed by law to force prisoners to work + increasing cost of rent + lower relative price of labor =

    spoiler

    Situation of dog eats dog, increasingly pauperized labor market where the poorest layer of the population gets enslaved, and the second poorest, and the third poorest, and the n-th poorest all will also fall one by one, because guess what? Free workers now have to compete in wages with prisoners.

    • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      They’re gonna learn the hard way there’s no such thing as free work when the workers slaves burn their factorys down.

      • GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s a refreshing thought, and I hope you’re right.

        If your labor is forced because you’re incarcerated, you’re absolutely justified in damaging your slavers any way you can. I’m not talking about work programs, unless they are “work programs” that you can be punished for not taking.

  • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    What the actual fuck.

    No it doesn’t work like that.

    Sleeping outside while homeless I am sure isn’t a deliberate choice. Homeless people aren’t magic. They can’t conjure a building to sleep in from thin air. Making it illegal doesn’t give tgem magic building making powers or like teleportation or whatever these delusional idiots think it does.

    • Chloé 🥕
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t give them magic building powers, but it fills up for-profit prisons!

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Lack of sleep can lead to psychosis and other mental issues. Preventing people from sleeping in some manner is just inviting unintentional consequences. More muggings, stabbings, rapes, looting or something else?

    People being homeless is a failure of society, not an individual.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Preventing people from sleeping in some manner is just inviting unintentional consequences.

      I don’t think the consequences are unintentional. Torturing a homeless person by continuously harassing them for trying to get sleep, then recording them lashing out at a city worker or police officer after they’ve snapped, produces a set of video content that can be spread across the internet and used as kindling to turn the housed public against the homeless.

      In the same way Project Veritas existed to harass and extort voting rights activists and health care centers, these laws and the associated anti-homeless activist base are going to be used to justify mass round-ups, imprisonments, and police executions of homeless people.

      This is real actual fascism in practice.

      People being homeless is a failure of society, not an individual.

      “If You Born Poor,It is not your mistake, but if you die poor,it is your mistake”

      ― Bill Gates Sr., Showing Up for Life: Thoughts on the Gifts of a Lifetime

      Should be noted that Gates Jr was born into a family of millionaires, with a mother who sat on the First Interstate Bank of Washington’s Board of Directors and a father who was a founding member of the law firm PGE. If you want to talk about individuals who might be responsible for homelessness, these two are a good place to start. They’ve been “philanthropists” for most of their adult lives and commanded billions of dollars in charitable donations. But the their tenure in these non-profits and committees have yielded rising poverty, declining standards of living, and enormous new personal debts.

      The folks who have horded the lion’s share of the national wealth firmly believe that they aren’t responsible for the consequential inequity and bankruptcy that their greed has produced.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think the lack of empathy and compassion for homeless people comes from the puritanical roots of America where failure in some aspect of life was related to moral or character failure.

        So again, it’s important to point out that the fact some people fall through the cracks means there are deficiencies in the social fabric which disallow optimal self determination for all individuals in that society. No one dreams of growing up to be a homeless person as a child.

        America is the one country in the world which has the resources to pull off market socialism correctly. But many progressive ideals are off the table because of rich or billionaire class.

        We should stop hating each other and just hate on the rich for robbing us of a healthy and well functioning society

  • gorgori@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    All recent stupid SC stuff is because of 6-3 votes. These old fucks are seated for life.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, 99% of voters pick capitalists every single time, and then clutch their pearls when capitalist things happen.

    On the plus side, it’s still possible to do good things on the local level. (For now.)

  • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    “When tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” — Thomas Jefferson

    When the government oversteps its authority and becomes tyrannical, then the governed have a responsibility to overthrow that government to reestablish the rights of the people to be free and only be governed by consent.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    Cities banning homeless people from sleeping outside while failing to give them any alternative is bad, but I think the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment is a poor protection against that. This is the sort of thing we need actual laws passed to deal with.

    • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      But it is actually cruel to create a system that deprives people of sleep, which is something they need, and sleep deprivation has been used as a form of torture.

  • NorDorf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    What if you aren’t homeless but still sleep outside as if you were homeless? Is that allowed? Imagining someone registering an address where homeless can state that they live (but without actually living there), to circumvent the law…

      • bolexforsoup
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The source is the article OP linked below the tweet.

        The Supreme Court agreed to take the case after hearing from an unlikely coalition that spanned the political spectrum, including liberals such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and officials in Republican-led states such as Montana and Alabama. The officials described governments overwhelmed by the scale and complexity of homelessness. More than 600,000 people are homeless nationwide, according to federal data, and nearly half sleep outside.

        Newsom — who leads the state with the country’s largest unhoused population and frequently criticizes the high court’s conservatives — welcomed the decision, saying it provides “definitive authority to implement and enforce policies to clear unsafe encampments from our streets.” This decision removes the legal ambiguities that have tied the hands of local officials for years and limited their ability to deliver on common-sense measures to protect the safety and well-being of our communities.”

      • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well he did have this to say about it so he certainly supports the decision:

        Today’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court provides state and local officials the definitive authority to implement and enforce policies to clear unsafe encampments from our streets. This decision removes the legal ambiguities that have tied the hands of local officials for years and limited their ability to deliver on common-sense measures to protect the safety and well-being of our communities.

        “California remains committed to respecting the dignity and fundamental human needs of all people and the state will continue to work with compassion to provide individuals experiencing homelessness with the resources they need to better their lives.”