• StThicket@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    6 months ago

    It amazes me that one of the largest countries in the world, with the most diverse demographics, can only chose between two candidates. This is not democracy. It’s a shit show that has been going on for far too long.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Said by a man who ran a country that outlawed all but the party he was prime minister of. He was probably a little salty about criticism over the lack of democracy in his country.

        • Hirom@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s interesting. Thanks for pointing it out.

          My point is having a very old constitution isn’t much of a boast if keeping it as-is causes political issues.

        • xor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Presumably what the other commenter was referring to is the US having the oldest codified constitution

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Which is honestly meaningless but very convenient for US narrations. There were also older de facto constitutions, which are usually forgotten like the Henrician Articles of P-L Commonwealth. US constitution is famous because it was the one which was loudly proclaimed and imitated later.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      didn’t you vote in the primary? why not?

      Americans got to choose between many candidates, and out of those, it’s down to 6, and of those 6, it’s only really likely 2, that’s true.

      But it isn’t quite like you imply.

          • StThicket@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I understand what you are trying to say. Ultimately, there are only two to vote for. Ideally, there should be more than two parties, and more than two candidates. That’s how democracies work. What you have is a dysfunctional system that divides people in two groups, and there are no incentives to cooperate between parties. Proper voting is also suffering due to the two-party system.

            https://youtu.be/yhO6jfHPFQU

            In my country, the parties with the majority of votes and the ability to cooperate gets to form a government. We also try to make it easy to get people to vote, insted of your system of gerrymandering.

      • nobody158@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        The shitty thing is by the time my states primary pretty much every else has dropped out. We need to run the primary like a real election not piecemeal.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The RNC never intended to run a candidate other than Trump because he controls MAGA, which is what remains of their energized base. The primaries they held were “just in case” Merrick Garland actually did something useful and successfully prosecuted Trump for insurrection, which never came to pass.

        The DNC did everything they could to prevent primary elections from occurring in various states, and bullied anyone who was floating a run into submission. This included the state dept making calls to state DNC committees to cancel primaries, or remove certain candidates from their ballots. According to them, it was an insult to Biden admin and their legacy to even suggest another candidate should run. And now look where that’s gotten us.

        So no, we didn’t actually vote in primaries this year because the establishment refuses to relinquish the status quo.