• Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can’t wait until USB-D is the standard and these dumb areas countries are stuck using outdated devices because someone mandated a technology that will go obsolete faster than the law can be changed.

    • Tiger Jerusalem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ah yes, let’s go back to that amazing time of pure innovation where every fucking company had their own connector standard for data, power and audio. Good times.

        • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 months ago

          Previous connectors had inherent flaws. The USB-C connector is sturdy, is easy to use etc. But even if we had made the micro-usb connector the only legal connector, it wouldn’t have been the end of the world. Existing standards can be improved instead of making new shapes each time.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          A and B are the original, used for host and device sides, respectively. C is the same on both ends of the cable because figures there’s device classes which can sensibly act as both, in particular phones. It’s also the most modern of the bunch supporting higher data transfer and power delivery rates because back in the days where A and B where designed people were thinking about connecting mice and keyboards, not 8k monitors or kWhs worth of lithium batteries.

          The whole mini/micro shennanigans are alternative B types and quite deeply flawed, mechanically speaking.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Your comprehension of this technology is so limited that you actually think that’s how it works.

      The letter simply indicates that the physical wiring in the cable is different to a previous iteration of the USB standard. There isn’t a great deal of reason that they would change that now it has a pretty good potential for energy transfer and high data transfer speeds. In 15 years they might be looking at changing it but not any time soon.

      Usb and B came out at the same time in the '90s for god’s sake.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          With 7 years of active use, USB-C is already 25% of the way there then.

          Once you actually start using devices that fully utilize all that USB-C has to offer, there is no going back. Getting lots of Power Delivery, Display, Networking and enough bandwidth for other USB devices all over one cable is just so good. At work i just walk up to any monitor, which will have all the necessary stuff attached, plug in one cable to my laptop and im good to go.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I resorted to splitting everything because I was burning docks, so now I’ve got four plugs taken on my laptop: a small USBC dock for one HDMI and power, one regular HDMI, one USBC to HDMI and one USBA for a four USBA hub… Which sucks because one USBC is able to handle all my needs, the docks are just shit…

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Some of us live in functioning democracies where “switch to USB-D” won’t come with an “it’s illegal to give your son a name that wasn’t previous a job title” attachment.