• Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    5 months ago

    Despite his efforts, Dolan’s message did not gain enough traction. His campaign, funded largely by personal loans, couldn’t match Ocasio-Cortez’s $8 million war chest.

    You people are living in an oligarchy and “who has more money for this season” being a perfectly normal news bit outside of popular sports is completely insane.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 months ago

      You realize that “you people” includes you, correct?

      Or are the mega rich treated just like everyone else where you are?

      If so, where is this magical land of fairness?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Eh… There are a variety of end-runs around this mechanism.

          Hiring politicians on as lobbyists or allowing friends and family to sit on private run boards and trusts can create a back channel for money to flow into a politician’s pockets. Public money can be funneled into private profits for which the supporting politicians are also stockholders. And politicians can receive discounted/free services from friendly private sector constituencies. FOX News, the classic example, is a multi-billion dollar network dedicated to running Republican-friendly media. But when corporate lobbyists and political strategists can be found everywhere from the boards of NPR/PBS to the guest chairs of MSNBC to the editorial rooms of the WaPo/WSJ/NYT, there’s really no safe spaces left.

          You can mitigate the direct “bag of cash for favors” effect that, say, John Boehner cutting tobacco lobbyist checks on the floor of the House has produced in the past. But you can’t keep public sector administrators from finding ways to receive kickbacks via private sector channels unless you completely divorce these institutions.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            5 months ago

            Eh… There are a variety of end-runs around this mechanism.

            There are any number of hypothetical end-runs around just about anything you can think of, that doesn’t make protections, mechanisms, controls, or safeties useless.

            In the US, political bribery is nearly 100% legal. I’d rather have some hoops for corrupt officials to jump through. We don’t even make them break a sweat in this country.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              There are any number of hypothetical end-runs

              Not even hypothetical. We just had the SCOTUS kick down the door on legal bribery in Snyder v United States.

              I’d rather have some hoops for corrupt officials to jump through

              I mean, if we’ve got a magic lamp I can do better than a few hoops. But the system is of the corrupt, by the corrupt, for the corrupt.

              At some point, you’re forced to recognized the farce of democracy at work.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                IIRC, people were talking about places in this thread that aren’t the US.

                As stated, political bribery in the US is nearly 100% legal. You can even study it in school and make a career out of it.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Sure, but that doesn’t mean that even discussing real or hypothetical measures to reign in corruption is inherently worthless because you can sometimes get around some of them.

                    I hate the US “either we solve everything, or nothing is worth doing” mindset that’s pervasive in this country, and the only reason I responded is because you’re providing a good example of it.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do not life in the US. However because of US hegemony and my country being a suck up to the US i have to follow what is going on there.

        But in case there is any doubt. The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the “center” parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The “liberal” middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

        So if you have the opportunity, please help spread awareness about all the shit happening here too.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, that’s right. The last European elections at the latest showed impressively that those dull people who are unable to see through the PR campaigns of the powerful are not an exclusive US problem. It is of course absolutely right that we in Europe rely far too much on the Americans and should set stricter limits to their capitalism, which in my opinion is completely out of joint. But I fear that we have already gotten too far into this quagmire. This is precisely why it is all the more important to raise awareness of this and to name those who are actually responsible for falling living standards and growing inequality - the US-type opportunists, the hangers-on and especially the blatant fascists in the ranks of our politicians and our societies. I am not at all convinced that the reasonable people have a shot, but I sure will continue to make an effort.

        • ssladam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Politics shift to the right when people feel disparity, and their future looks break. Politics shift left when people feel optimistic about their future.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Which is absolutely fucking stupid because we need leftist politics when the future looks bleak and when the future looks rosy that is the time to be more conservative about change…

            But we’re just human, we do everything ass backwards :/

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s because billionaires have purchased SCOTUS. The outcome of a single court case has allowed unlimited money from whomever into election campaigns.