You know, where dissenters get downvoted.
If you came to talk politics, your gonna be a minority. If you came for hobbies, it’s a pretty chill place. Just block the major ragebait type communities and it’s all good.
This is pretty tough to do though since I see new ones crop up every day in my feed
Use the Subscribed feed.
In your feed of subscribed communities? Or in the All feed? Because yeah if you browse all and expect to only see content you like, you’re gonna have a bad time
Echo chamber probably isn’t the best framing for it. I would say that the ethos of FOSS and the values of privacy which might incline a person towards these platforms is generally more in line with liberal views than conservative ones. What I’ve seen personally however, is that it’s not about whether you’re right or left, but in how you articulate your ideas. Low-effort posts that go against the grain, may very well be downvoted, whereas a well thought post that runs against that same grain might be met with discussion, but not necessarily downvotes.
Well, I know that part about the FOSS spirit and dissatisfaction with big corporations controlling the internet. Anyhow, I’ve seen here many occasions of what I would call a tactical voting where well formulated and polite comments get downvoted.
I’m sure that does happen. I don’t know if it happens broadly.
Here’s my one and only reply, who the fuck cares if you get downvotes. This isn’t reddit and you shouldn’t base your whole life on Internet points. If you don’t like the progressive viewpoints that most places like this attract to open minded and free thinkers, then either block those communities or find someplace that’s a better fit for you. I find people with similar viewpoints, but newsflash, the world outside MAGA world isn’t a right wing mob. The majority of the world are more “leftist”.
Given that anyone could set up their own instance with whatever rules they like, I don’t think it would make sense to say that “Lemmy” is “liberal”. It’s kind of like asking if email is liberal.
However, it is certainly the case that different instances have different political leanings as established by the instance administrators.
Likewise, communities are governed by their moderators, but as this is Lemmy, if you don’t like the way the moderators run their community, you can create a community of your own. Then you can have an echo chamber filled with everyone who agrees with you!
So, it is what we make of it. We can have liberal, center, or conservative echo chambers if that’s what we want, or we can have knock down drag out fights with people who will never agree with us.
It’s important to remember that in Lemmy downvotes are like the points in Whose Line Is it Anyway: they don’t matter.
I totally agree. We can have whatever political direction that we choose, nevertheless in practice it seems the majority of Lemmy is liberal & progressive & leftist. There is obviously nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is downvoting & upvoting along these political lines and disregarding how well is each idea formulated. It does happen too often in my opinion.
Like you, all can vote using whatever metrics they see fit. I don’t care if you downvote cripples and Klingons. Ideally if a given community is worth a shit, the net tally will show as such.
I haven’t seen that. The Fediverse in general is more left & libertarian than liberal or conservative. You almost by definition have to be a little quirky and care about privacy or the shared commons enough to seek out alternatives to centralized, corporate social media. So, in terms of American politics, you’ll find more true independents and people who vote for 3rd parties than your normie conservative Republicans or liberal/neoliberal Democrats.
So, dissent in general is definitely appreciated on the Fediverse — we’re all here because we opted out of some popular social network — but if you’re trying to hate on or control some people you’ve never met, you’ll probably get downvoted by leftists and libertarians. But being downvoted doesn’t make it an echo chamber. It usually means you stepped outside yours.
No, I’ve seen a diverse range of views, including several explicitly postliberal ones.
Unless you’re using “liberal” as lazy shorthand for the US left-wing, in which case still no, because it’s not an echo chamber, but yes, views that are left-of-(American)-center are predominant.
Postliberal?
Some ideologies are illiberal because they predate liberalism. Some illiberal ideologies came after, but explicitly reject liberalism. Almost all postliberal ideologies (almost all illiberal ideologies in general, as a rule) are considered pretty extreme.
Without criticizing the use of “echo chamber” - Lemmy (and the fediverse in general) is not liberal, but leftist. The entire concept of decentralization/federation/FOSS is leftist.
If this is the first time you are hearing that liberals and leftists are different things (not unusual for those who have gone their whole lives trapped in right wing “echo chambers”): The key difference between liberalism (which is centrist) and leftism is that liberalism enables and encourages the consolidation of wealth & power (rightward drift) while leftism actively advocates against the excessive accumulation of wealth & power, as doing so eventually creates inequity and oppression.
There are plenty of products out there that have authoritarian/right wing owners and moderators, and those are the places right wingers tend to congregate. But software like Lemmy that is built entirely on leftist principles - like democracy and free access to the means of production (i.e. source code) - is going to inherently attract more leftists.
I meant liberalism as progressivism and leftism, not economic liberalism nor libertarianism. What I mind is that herd behaviour of many fellows who downvote stuff even if it’s a plausible idea, and vice versa.
Liberalism, progressivism, and leftism are not synonyms. In a Venn diagram there may be some overlap, but they are still very distinct.
Liberalism and leftism are “absolutes” while progressivism is a relative. In all cases, these concepts are about the rejection of control and subjugation. If you wander into a left-leaning space and find yourself downvoted, it’s not because of “herd behavior” but because you said something wildly unpopular (e.g. authoritarian apologetics).
Whether you think something is “plausible” is beside the point. If it is unfair, inequitable, or otherwise supports, advocates, excuses, or leads to “some being more equal than others” then leftists will rake you over the coals.
One more thing to remember: leftists are so used to being misrepresented, lied about, vilified, and trolled by the right (including liberals) that there is very little patience for anyone that stumbles in and spouts any manner of right-wing rhetoric, because it’s almost NEVER someone trying to engage in good faith.
So ask yourself this: WHY is what you’re saying unpopular?
If you are willing to swallow your pride and challenge yourself, most leftists will be happy to discuss just about any topic… if you are able to build the trust that you’re exploring a topic in good faith. Asking challenging questions is a good approach; in lieu of making statements, always ask questions. Everybody loves answering questions. Challenging others leads to conflict (and downvotes), but challenging yourself leads to enlightenment.
With federation lemmy is many different echo chambers.
So like a chaos chamber
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I partly agree with you but I’m afraid it still won’t stop voting along political lines.
In the politics communities, yes. Just block them. You will be a happier person.
If you want somewhere that definitely isn’t a liberal echo chamber there is always Lemmygrad. It’s so much not a liberal echo chamber that a lot of liberal instances have them blocked. It’s also awesome.
I think you don’t understand the term liberal properly though.
Lemmy is Free Open Source Software allowing anyone to host a content aggregator website. Lemmy instances can federate with each other to make it look like one big website to users. It was created from the ground up to avoid corporate influence.
A group of people working together towards a common goal while doing their best to avoid corporate influence is probably going to be mostly liberal minded.
I don’t see much of an echochamber though, although that’s probably because I block a lot of it. I prefer a post have a well thought out argument rather than “lol conservatives dumb”. If someone had a well thought out reason for being against a liberal policy I’d give it an upvote. It’s just that these rarely exist. It’s mostly just reactionary comments.
Less so than reddit.
These types of posts and discussions are worthless when the participants don’t even agree on the definition of the terms being bandied about.
