Colorado congressional candidate and sitting State Rep. Richard Holtorf ® received a tough grilling this week at the hands of local 9News anchor Kyle Clark over his apparent hypocrisy when it comes to abortion rights.

Holtorf made headlines back in January when he defended paying for his girlfriend’s abortion, despite being an adamant pro-life lawmaker and abortion critic. “Anti-abortion GOP lawmaker praises the impact of the abortion he paid for,” read the headline of a local report by Clark from the beginning of the year.

To his credit, Holtorf sat down with Clark to discuss the issue.

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Why do you seek to deny [the right to an abortion] to other women?” Clark pressed.

    “Let me, let me — I don’t, I don’t,” Holtorf replied.

    “You have voted to restrict abortion access,” Clark shot back.

    “And I have. And I’m a pro-life person. I think you should try to choose life every time. But there are exceptions. And there are times when you need abortion. Abortion is a medical procedure,” declared Holtorf.

    There are exceptions, like when it’s inconvenient for the rich and powerful. Other people should (be compelled by law to) choose life every time.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      5 months ago

      So, pro choice then. Come on “pro-life” people if you make exceptions you are pro choice. Abortion should be legal and accessible to women who need it, birth control too.

    • madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re projecting logical thinking. Stop.

      The Republicans need wedge issues for culture wars. It’s a numbers game and that’s all they care about.

      Projecting logic and critical thinking on a party that’s moving towards fascism is a fool’s errand.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    5 months ago

    “And I have. And I’m a pro-life person. I think you should try to choose life every time. But there are exceptions. And there are times when you need abortion. Abortion is a medical procedure,” declared Holtorf.

    “Is one of the exceptions when Richard Holtorf is the father?” Clark demanded.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      139
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m a pro-life person … there are times when you need an abortion.

      That’s pro-choice my man.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s surprising how often “pro-life” people turn out to be pro-choice when pressed a little on the realities of people’s lives. They seem to maintain the pro-life stance only through a refusal to think about difficult situations - which makes no sense since the whole debate is precisely about difficult situations.

        And they commonly just don’t seem to understand what pro-choice means. They think it means being someone who just loves abortions and thinks they’re great and unproblematic and everyone should get one. They don’t realize there are no such people, because they’ve never actually asked and listened, or given it any thought.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Cognitive dissonance is fucking wild.

          *edit I definitely am not using that term correctly. Double think? Someone help me out here.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      This quote pissed me off. I’m fucking pro choice AF and this to me just says this interview wasn’t anything but to make him feel and look stupid and strengthen identity politics. It is gross. A real thoughtful response would have GRASPED onto that admittance that it is a medical procedure and point out how the law has hindered necessary medical treatment for fear of courts deeming it “illegal” because now politicians with power and monetary motivations get to decide what is medically necessary and not anyone with education in medicine or science even.

      Grab those “liberal” threads they tried to deny is reality and pull it to the forefront don’t just butt heads with stupid fucking onelines that could make a headline.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I want to agree with you, but… We have decades of that just not working.

        Anyone able to be persuaded by what you’re describing would have been persuaded by the obvious hypocrisy of the answer itself.

        Mockery is a rhetorical device that can be persuasive, and we don’t always need to be nice to people when their open hypocrisy is destroying lives.

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        he got his girlfriend an abortion while limiting the rights of his constituents.

        done deal. nuff said. if you don’t get the obvious hypocrisy that’s on you mate.

      • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Sound bytes are more valuable to the journalists employer than all that full story nonsense. Why don’t they realize true revolution and change would generate far more income and viewership than this bullshit ?

    • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      5 months ago

      Holtorf: That’s just a story. What’s more important is the policy.

      The policy is the whole fucking problem! His hypocrisy is an issue because, even with a complete lack of any ability to empathize with different people in different circumstances (which I assume as a default from right-wingers), he ought to understand this situation because it did happen to him. Yet he just doesn’t care. Christ, what an asshole.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean, I’d rather he have no kids, so I agree that him being the father should be an exception.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    5 months ago

    I noticed this is not a Sinclair owned Network. I imagine that’s the only reason they were able to ask this question.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Could you like me to more about this? I did a quick search and didn’t find relevant pages. Thought I’d ask if you have a direct link handy.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        He was a moderator of a Republican debate the other day and ran it fantastically. Jimmy Kimmel picked it up because it was soooo good. Just look up Jimmy Kimmel Kyle Clark.

        Side note, as a Coloradoan, I just want to say that Kyle Clark is a state treasure.

      • KNova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        He isn’t literally running a clinic (umm that I’m aware of). It’s a figure of speech.

        Kyle Clark is the anchor for 9News here in the Denver metro area / Colorado

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Republicans will whine about the unfair treatment by the interviewer, deflecting from the utter hypocrisy of this vapid idiot.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not even a “gotcha” question. He seems to be clear that his girlfriend’s abortion allowed her to live her best life, and he supported it. So it stands to reason that if he’s voting to restrict abortion, that there must be some line between his girlfriend’s situation, which he supported, and what he votes to restrict. And asking that question is key to understanding his position (if giving him a whole HEAP of benefit-of-the-doubt he doesn’t deserve).

      If he wanted to maintain any kind of consistency, he could have simply said “it’s legal right now, so it was her decision and she was able to get one, and if there is a financial burden in that I should take equal responsibility. I don’t think it should be an option, but I can’t make her choose not to when it isn’t illegal.” And that would be that. Even the “best life” thing could be squared away: “It’s never good when a life that should come into this world never sees daylight, but there are, of course, some options that are available that wouldn’t exist with a child, and she has those options. Many women have children unexpectedly and have rich, fulfilling lives, even if they weren’t what they planned. What I meant by her best life is to say she could continue on the path she found to be best, before she found out she was pregnant.”

      I’m about as pro-choice as it gets and even I can come up with some shitty justifications for his bullshit hypocrisy. So it’s not just that this guy is a hypocrite, he’s also an idiot. If you’re incapable of explaining your actions and voting, you have no business running for any political position.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Repubs have difficulty with consistency and integrity because they value truth less than they value white supremacist hierarchy. It’s a tricky question for them because they all implicitly understand that the laws are only requirements for poors at the bottom of the hierarchy. They also know they aren’t supposed to say that out loud.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    this guy comoderated the republican primary in Colorado as well and he was incredible. didn’t take bullshit and put everyone (including and especially boebert) in their place. what a hero.

  • RatsOffToYa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    Catholic eh? Someone should contact his local church and remind the pastor of canon law:

    “Canon 1397 §2 is a paragraph of the canon 1397 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law of the Catholic Church; the paragraph states: “A person who actually procures an abortion incurs a latae sententiae excommunication”.”

    He was excommunicated the second his payment went through.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    These people drive me crazy. I never had an abortion because I think it’s creepy as fuck but I don’t think my experience should define everyone else’s, these men are evil. If a lady has to have an abortion, she has to. Nobody wants to, and they want to heap shame on top of that, but literally will NEVER have to make that choice because they are men. Fuck off.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s the thing, isn’t it? Literally nobody wants one. But Repubs keep telling lies like women choose abortion as their primary means of birth control.

      • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Fr I’ve seen so many people claim women will get em willy nilly. Like no, that shit is a last resort.

      • Dantpool@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because it’s never been about protecting the unborn for the actual politicians, it’s always been about controlling women.