• TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    SO the point of the militias were that the Founding Fathers believed that giving any executive access to a standing army would, eventually if not immediately, act against the rights of humans.

    So instead we were supposed to have a populace ready and trained in military activity by the states’ ordained and defined by Congress militias.

    The 2nd was to try and stop a ruler from having access to force.

    And now we have a standing military, a military-armed police, and paramilitary civilians.

    Worst civilization decision evar.

    We are so far from the Federalist Paper #29 argument for the 2nd Amendment; we need to amend the Constitution.

    federalist 29 is like 13 paragraphs it is worth reading

    • Fuzemain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe that massive standing army isn’t a good thing to have. A lot of the original criticisms match our current army pretty well.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem now is that in the modern global age we have plenty of enemies who have massive standing armies. China and Russia leap to mind. That sort of thing may have worked when America was physically isolated from outside forces by a several months long boat ride. Not the case anymore.

        Abolishing everybody’s massive standing armies would be a pretty good idea, but I don’t foresee that happening any time soon.