• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    What do you mean “will be”? They’ve explicitly encouraged having large families for centuries, and implicitly encouraged having kids outside a family too, by forbidding birth control and abortion.

    • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes but on the surface at least they also insist on monogamy or at the very least serial monogamy. Free love is typically more of a polyamorous movement.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          When your brother married a hottie so you “accidentally” spill cyanide in his tea.

          • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Similar to the “Uriah Method.” Send him to the front line of a battle, feign sadness upon his untimely (yet highly anticipated) death, then steal his wife.

        • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I actually know of one guy from an extremely religious family that married his brother’s wife when his brother died. I always wondered if it was true love or duty.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That I am less upset about. Kids were a net profit in that time period. For a woman passed the point where she can just get married, with presumably her dowry being depleted, having a kid with the brother meant that she would have a hand in the whole not starving thing.

          I won’t judge people that poor for making hard decisions. Just be glad that no one reading this lives in a world like that.