Actually, really liked the Apple Intelligence announcement. It must be a very exciting time at Apple as they layer AI on top of the entire OS. A few of the major themes.

Step 1 Multimodal I/O. Enable text/audio/image/video capability, both read and write. These are the native human APIs, so to speak.

Step 2 Agentic. Allow all parts of the OS and apps to inter-operate via “function calling”; kernel process LLM that can schedule and coordinate work across them given user queries.

Step 3 Frictionless. Fully integrate these features in a highly frictionless, fast, “always on”, and contextual way. No going around copy pasting information, prompt engineering, or etc. Adapt the UI accordingly.

Step 4 Initiative. Don’t perform a task given a prompt, anticipate the prompt, suggest, initiate.

Step 5 Delegation hierarchy. Move as much intelligence as you can on device (Apple Silicon very helpful and well-suited), but allow optional dispatch of work to cloud.

Step 6 Modularity. Allow the OS to access and support an entire and growing ecosystem of LLMs (e.g. ChatGPT announcement).

Step 7 Privacy. <3

We’re quickly heading into a world where you can open up your phone and just say stuff. It talks back and it knows you. And it just works. Super exciting and as a user, quite looking forward to it.

https://x.com/karpathy/status/1800242310116262150?s=46

    • Z4rK@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      8·
      5 months ago

      Care to elaborate?

      The suspicious parts to me was that they didn’t show much of the private cloud stuff, how much it would cost, and that they still feel the need to promote ChatGPT .

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlEnglish
        28·
        5 months ago

        All of it sounds like marketing and I have serious doubt’s about their commitment to, or ability to respect privacy when one of their previous points is that they plan to integrate third party systems. So…I have doubts.

        • Z4rK@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          12·
          5 months ago

          I mean, that’s fair, I personally use Apple devices specifically because I trust them the most on privacy, but if you don’t trust Apple with privacy, which is a 100% valid take to have, then of course this mayor selling point of their marketing becomes moot.

          • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlEnglish
            15·
            5 months ago

            I would not give the right of anyone deciding what is good for my privacy, including Apple. This should be a judgement made by myself.

            • Z4rK@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
              3·
              5 months ago

              I do agree, but privacy in 2024 is sadly about trust, not technology, unless you yourself can design and create every chip used in your devices and in the network cells you connect to. No setting on your device on “do not allow…” have any meaning without trust in the creator.

              • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlEnglish
                4·
                5 months ago

                I didn’t say trust no one, but whom and what I trust shall be decided by me. Yes, there are things we can’t just build in our garage, yet there are tools enables us to investigate, and people and organization working on it. Maybe Apple’s take on AI have better privacy then others, but that shall be investigated and proven upon after release, not automatically granted.