You must log in or register to comment.
Ugh baby, cocaine in the yacht jacuzzi again? Cant we stay at home one weekend?
I like this explanation better lol
Q: Why does Leo only date beautiful 23 year olds?
A: Because he can.
My question is rather why do the 23 year olds date him.
I guess also because they can…
Fun coupons. So many fun coupons
ok but like do they also kiss him for that? because eww
It’s the legal way to sell your body.
Because he is famous and rich?
Whats hard to understand about that?
Lots of women have a thing for older men, or are willing to put up with older men for the benefits that come with it (money, fame, etc)
How do you even date twenty people at once???
It’s easy when they’re only 3 years old.
Real life Mr Peanutbutter.
Really makes a lot of sense.
It’s true, I’ve watched this documentary about this woman in her twenties who dumped Leo after being in an dysfunctional relationship with him.
I think it’s called “The Wolf of Wall Street” or something.
Yeah, but it still doesn’t explain why he’s never dated (since he was 25) a woman his own age.
Or I guess he’s just an instant bore to anyone who has life experience? That seems possible.
Boy you catch on quick
Thatsthejoke.jpeg
If I was a rich Megastar I too would use my status and money to date beautiful young women
I very much wouldn’t. I’m not interested in the kinds of things a young trophy wife is going to offer. I think being a rich megastar would be bad for my dating game, because it would attract all the wrong people.
deleted by creator
I’m in my 30’s too and teach at university and train a lot of staff in their early 20s at work. 20s really seems like and extension of teenage years to me now. I would feel like I’m dating someone underage.
I just bought a stihl 131 and I’ve been enjoying it way to much.
Every woman coincidentally dumps him at 25 because they just reached enlightenment all at the same age? No, he dumps them because he is writing his own lore.
I don’t find it funnier, but that’s my honest opinion. Know why? Because there’s nothing ‘objective’ about it.
Why do people like to fuck these words up?
People like to spice their words up. Take the literal stick out your hypothetical hole.
That’s weak word spice. That’s not even spice, that’s fucking word sand. That is word chalk.
Your opinion is unwelcome and rejected.
Apologies, mr spokesperson for humankind.
you’re objectively wrong.
