New accessibility feature coming to Firefox, an “AI powered” alt-text generator.


"Starting in Firefox 130, we will automatically generate an alt text and let the user validate it. So every time an image is added, we get an array of pixels we pass to the ML engine and a few seconds after, we get a string corresponding to a description of this image (see the code).

Our alt text generator is far from perfect, but we want to take an iterative approach and improve it in the open.

We are currently working on improving the image-to-text datasets and model with what we’ve described in this blog post…"

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is actually one of the few cases where it makes sense. Its for alt-text for people who browse with TTS

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, this is actually a pretty great application for AI. It’s local, privacy-preserving and genuinely useful for an underserved demographic.

        One of the most wholesome and actually useful applications for LLMs/CLIP that I’ve seen.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      it’s not pointless; it’s amazing for accessibility, especially in pdfs.

      • ColdWater@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well I do agree it’ll be useful for people who need it, but for most people it’s pretty pointless and I hope at least they don’t enable it by default just like Windoze sticky key because ai use a lot of system resources for a little benefits especially with self hosted ai

        • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          beehaw is a safe-space, we shouldnt villify the experiences/needs of people who need alt-text. this could be game changing for people who need it.

          • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Alternatively, it could be very frustrating for people who need it. Computer-generated translations are often very bad compared to human ones, and image recognition adds another layer of complexity that will very likely lack nuance. It could create a false sense of accessibility with bad alt-text, and could make it more difficult to spot real alt-text if it isn’t being tagged or labeled as AI generated

            • frogman [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              i don’t think we disagree in a vacuum but bringing that up in the context of this particular thread is probably unhelpful

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      Its for blind people, it let’s them know what is in images using a screen reader, just because it doesn’t apply to you doesn’t mean it’s useless