A corporation should not be allowed to own and rent out a residential property.
You want apartment buildings to be exclusively owned by a handful of billionaires? Because those take a lot of capital that most individuals don’t have.
There should be a cap on the number of single family or duplex/triplex/quadplex/whateverplex free standing residences a commercial entity is allowed to own. Attempting to evade this cap with LLC’s and shell corporations and suchlike needs to result in jail time for those responsible. You want to be a small time landlord and rent out 1 or 2, or 5 or 6 properties? Fine. But nobody needs 100. If big capital wants to do big capital things, they can build tower blocks. Isn’t that what the walkable-cities-urban-utopists are always nattering on about anyway?
Homes are for homeowners to own. Not for private capital to speculate on.
You want apartment buildings to be exclusively owned by a handful of billionaires? Because those take a lot of capital that most individuals don’t have.
Cooperatives exist. This is how many condos work.
There should be a cap on the number of single family or duplex/triplex/quadplex/whateverplex free standing residences a commercial entity is allowed to own. Attempting to evade this cap with LLC’s and shell corporations and suchlike needs to result in jail time for those responsible. You want to be a small time landlord and rent out 1 or 2, or 5 or 6 properties? Fine. But nobody needs 100. If big capital wants to do big capital things, they can build tower blocks. Isn’t that what the walkable-cities-urban-utopists are always nattering on about anyway?
Homes are for homeowners to own. Not for private capital to speculate on.
Co-ops are corporations too.
But you’re right about corporate ownership of small homes vs. apartment buildings.