• DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not going to argue with someone about the story they tell me and how it made them feel because an individual’s biased perspective is not an objective observation of how the vote system works. This isn’t about you.

    • LegionEris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve declared someone you disagree with is making things up while criticizing the debate skills and tactics of those who disagree with you. What a fucking joke. You got some peer reviewed numbers to support your position about votes and arguments? Because from where I’m sitting, this nonsensical notion that people vote rigorously based on debate acumen and never with their emotions and libido along the lines of their existing beliefs is just as much a made up story. I’m not going to find numbers for a bad faith participant like you, but we already know people vote for real, important, world changing things with their emotions. The idea that the general populace is wildly more reasonable and responsible when the votes don’t matter at all is ludicrous.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        LegionEris, I have seen what you describe many times, and you have put the case eloquently. I just wish you didn’t have to.

        Meanwhile, as a latecomer I’m laughing my ass off because this comment now stands at -11:

        If you’re getting downvoted in an argument, guess what, that means you’re bad at making arguments. And this system is exactly the same, regardless of if you can see it or not, sorting by top will still sort by the net sum of votes.