• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Must they continue to do so? On their own they are nothing but stand-ins for people or ideologies. If we can reclaim entire slurs, surely we can reclaim these, no?

    • Chloé 🥕
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Even on their own, the shitty alt-right ideology is still present. Notice how the chad, the guy we’re meant to agree with, is very often (not always, but often) a white, blonde-haired, blue-eyed guy?

      Or how the guy with the wrong opinions we’re meant to mock is often a drooling person with a dented head?

      The ableism and white supremacy of the right is still perceptible in the meme, even when it’s used to push leftist messages.

      and on a more basic level, the idea of bad opinion = ugly, good opinion = beautiful is shitty and flirts with white supremacy (because what’s beautiful is very often dictated by eurocentric beauty standards), but that’s a problem in our societies as a whole, not just with this meme

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        None of those things necessarily need to be true, especially not

        the idea of bad opinion = ugly, good opinion = beautiful is shitty and flirts with white supremacy

        The shouting crying soyjak for depicting opinions of people who continue to hold stupid opinions despite all evidence to the contrary fits fairly well, and if you don’t like the beauty standards set by the default chad, there’s nothing stopping you from substituting your own, or just using any calm, levelheaded character in its place.