• BuckFigotstheThird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Idk why you’re being downvoted; It’s stated that they know she’s trans, then throughout, they misgender her five times and also discredit every trans person, ever, with the usage of the word “thinks”. Transphobic at the worst, ignorant at best.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah it was also 1987 and the worked Was filled to the brim with right-wing propaganda. Even people who wanted to be progressive didn’t really know how to refer to anyone correctly, there was no one to teach them.

      Why don’t we cut it some slack for even existing at all? Is this really worse than nothing? Literally my first exposure to the concept of trans.

      • 1ostA5tro6yne
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Literally my first exposure to the concept of trans.

        same though, that blurb set off a chain of events in my small child brain that eventually culminated in me coming out and starting transition. it’s not “woke” now, but it was as close as you could hope for back then.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Idk why you’re being downvoted

      Because 1. that term is thrown around so often and so loosely-defined now it is sometimes losing its meaning, 2. nobody was intentionally trying to upset anyone, especially back then, and 3. not everyone agrees with the concept as a whole to begin with. Regardless of your beliefs I don’t even fault e.g. christians for only believing in biological male and female, as that’s what their book says and you’re not going to change everyone’s mind so easily or at all.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t think you’ll get much agreement for your third point, but I completely agree with your first two. Reading something from over 30 years ago and applying modern sensibilities to it is stupid.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m pretty sure their book doesn’t say anything explicit about this topic. They choose to interpret passages in specific ways to foster their agenda, which is not ok at all.

        • BuckFigotstheThird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          BULLSHIT 2:43 AND THEN THE LORD SAID, BIOLOGICAL WOMEN SHOULD SHUT THIER MOUTHS IN THE CHURCH, BUT TRANS WOMEN CAN SPEAK, BECAUSE TRANS WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICAL MEN AND WE SHOULD HATE THEM, PASS DISCRIMINATORY LAWS AND DISSEMINATE LIES AND PROPAGANDA ABOUT THEM WHILE WAVING A FLAG AND CARRYING A BIBLE. (/s)

          Yea, there is no mention of trangender people in the Bible, and honestly, its not my religion and I dont believe any of it, nor should any of it dictate my life. I am not a Christian, and I have freedom of religion.