• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sorry, wrong target. Sue the cops who didn’t act. Oh, wait. They’re basically untouchable. Well, I guess sue yourselves for having children in America. That’s about the only case you might win.

  • Crismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    4 months ago

    I find it sad that some lawyer sold them on this suit, while also settling with the police department for peanuts.

    The police caused all of the extra pain here, and no studies have ever shown a link to violence from video games.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have no doubt that Adam Lanza’s obsession with Dance Dance Revolution compelled him to commit the Sandy Hook massacre.

      That’s how they get you. Before it was Catcher In The Rye, then it was Helter Skelter. Next it’ll be Kirby’s Return to Dream Land Deluxe!

      It’s the tessellation of the splines, I tell you! THE TESSELLATION OF THE SPLINES

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 months ago

    The fact that CoD doesn’t even use real guns/manufacturers anymore makes me think this suit has zero chance. Video games do not cause violence, certainly not more than any other media!

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah, without evidence that Activision/CoD were intentionally in cahoots with arms manufacturers, this is pretty flimsy.

      I do think the case against Daniel Defense is stronger, though. I can see a legitimate argument being made that guns should not be advertised directly at teenagers and young men, and that firearms shouldn’t be advertised on social media in general.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    「Points to US Army.」

    COD has had creepy right wing ideology sewn into it at least as far back as Ghosts (which also featured – I hear – amazing dog levels) but yes, even recent one had messages more about _are you willing to make the tough choices [and commit atrocities] in the name of national security. That’s pretty right-wing.

    But that doesnt qualify as incitement to action (at least not in US law) because it isn’t specific (e.g. Justice Thomas must be killed before he does any further damage to our civil rights )

    Freedom of speech allows us to paint groups as bad guys in art, and it’s up to our critics and curators to highlight these and other problematic features.

  • nomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe they should switch gears and try suing them for motivating basement dwelling armchair Action heroes so they became Uvalde Cops. No wonder they thought they could handle a shooter until shit got real.

    • EldritchFeminity
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah yes, because being a good parent and making sure your kid goes to school would’ve certainly prevented them from getting shot at the elementary school 😅🤔.

    • grff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      This right here. Lack of parenting is the issue . And children in school these days , their mental health is ignored and we let kids graduate despite not meeting requirements. No wonder we have such an issue with disrespect, mental health, and intelligence. We are failing a generation and its now starting to catch up

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    it’s interesting how they got to this target as conclusion.

    for places that don’t ban guns, every walmart would have them with minimal barriers for buying.

    like what steam does for games, maybe it’s because these guns are that easy to acquire to begin with?