• specialdealer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the dumbest take. Most crimes require an element of intent. Using the same bag you use to take shooting or hunting is not intent to smuggle weapons. The quantities of the items found demonstrate no ill intent.

    Just because you personally disagree with the 100 million gun owners doesn’t make this a moderate take. Imprisoning people for years because of a loose round in luggage is moronic politically and a waste of tax money.

    • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 months ago

      The casual implication here that a round of ammo in your luggage doesn’t imply you are an unsafe gun owner is insane. Lost rounds don’t just happen, they are a sign that the person didn’t account for all their ammo and secure it properly. There’s no reason to give these people a pass.

      • specialdealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I didnt say it wasn’t irresponsible and I didnt say give them a pass. I said don’t give them years in prison for an honest harmless mistake. Maybe ban them from returning? Something less extreme…

          • specialdealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I understand what words mean, thanks. I’m responding to the hordes of teenagers frothing at the mouth for severe punishment in these cases. There are 5 now.

              • specialdealer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                5 legal cases so far. Hordes of people in this and similar threads trying to hang tourists from the nearest tree because they enjoy guns.

                • PapaStevesy@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  5 cases is not very many, considering how long guns have been legal in this country and illegal in others. Doesn’t seem like a problem at all to me, just check your shit if you commonly carry murder implements around. 🤷‍♂️ Idk what else to tell you, these people didn’t even get punished.

              • Slayan@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Can’t you see? The dude is fighting for their life. He’s literally spearheading the defense of those poor american. He might also be the one who will change the law of another country. 😄🫡

          • specialdealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do you realize there are 5 cases already like this? Do you know why? Because this mistake is super common.

            Do you realize that means this probably happened dozens of times a year before this recent change took effect? And that all those people in the past returned home with their ammo completely undetected by anyone, including themselves?

            You know what something’s called when nobody even notices it happened?

            Harmless. Absent of harm.

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              6 months ago

              Do you realize there are 5 cases already like this? Do you know why? Because this mistake is super common.

              Maybe it’s common for Americans to be this lax with their weaponry?

              I don’t see the citizens of other countries making the same “common” mistake.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Smuggling is always the smugglers fault.

      That he’s an irresponsible gun owner too is just the cherry on top.

      • specialdealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        You keep using that word. It isn’t smuggling, it is forgetting a round of ammo in a bag. Your view on this is extreme. There is nuance in the world…

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          And this is why drug cartels use cute white women as mules - to skate by on “It’s for personal use” excuses if they get caught.

          • specialdealer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Also a really fucking stupid take? It should always be based on the facts of the case, not the color of skin or gender. If a cute white woman is carrying guns and hundreds of rounds of ammo punish away.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why are you so certain that the people in this case weren’t intentionally smuggling ammunition?

                  • specialdealer@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Have you ever been to the range? How much ammo did you use? If you wanted to smuggle and sell ammo into another country for money, how much would you bring? Would you bring your wife and book a vacation stay?

                • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Yea, but I don’t have solid evidence either way since I’m not on the ground there - what makes you so certain these people weren’t smugglers? What part of this story has you so willing to go to bat for them?

                  • specialdealer@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    Then you should try reading the article. It describes 4 of the recent cases. In those cases people were not found with guns and had 2, 2, 4, and 20 rounds of ammo respectively.

                    Go to the gun range once and you’ll understand that’s not smuggling ammunition for criminal use. That’s an oopsie I forgot that was in that bag.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          He packed his own contraband in his own bag and brought it to a foreign country.

          That’s the definition of smuggling.

            • EisFrei@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              6 months ago

              The Oxford dictionary definition:

              smuggling noun

              the illegal movement of goods into or out of a country. “cocaine smuggling has increased alarmingly”

              • specialdealer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                You see how it says “illegal” there? In smuggling cases there has to be this other thing called “intent” for it to have been illegal.

                If a Mexican gets some codeine at a Mexican pharmacy, forgets it in their bag, and flies into the USA we don’t pay tax money to imprison them for years. We take it, ban them, and send them back.

                Why? Because they are careless, not smugglers.

                • breakingcups@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The law does not universally require “intent”, I might not intend to speed in my car or fuck a 17 year old, but if it happens I am still responsible.

                  • specialdealer@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 months ago

                    You missed the part where I wrote “in smuggling cases”.

                    ETA: you also listed examples that do require intent… like omg I accidentally fucked a 17 year old.

                    Or omg my car just drove itself too fast.

                    What? Think then type.

                • EisFrei@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  But why would you ban them, if they didn’t do anything illegal?

                  You basically confirm that it is illegal. Now it’s just about the punishment.

    • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Try getting busted entering the US with half a gram of weed stuck in some fold of your bag, and see how they treat you.

      • specialdealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The only thing that would happen is confiscation and denied entry.

        And what is your point? That imprisoning those people for 4 years is good and fair policy and other countries should do it too?

      • specialdealer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You are wrong, that is not true at all. We confiscate the items, sometimes deny entry, and sometimes ban future entry. It happens all the time with pharmaceuticals, produce, and any number of other goods that are legal elsewhere but not here. Spending tax money to imprison people for years over minor cultural differences and misunderstandings is absolutely brain dead policy.

        There are already 5 cases like this because this is a super common mistake and T+C recently implemented a change in their policy for handling it.