• woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Mandatory “one nation under god” pledge in school classes disagrees that religion cannot be established.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      The pledge isn’t mandatory. By law, it has to be optional. Schools have gotten in trouble over it.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t bother. Every time you point out they say something that isn’t true, they change the subject.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There are so many cases of promoting Christianity by the US government, a few cherrypicked cases of “trouble” doesn’t disprove any of this.

        • “As a matter of historical tradition, the words ‘under God’ can no more be expunged from the national consciousness than the words ‘In God We Trust’ from every coin in the land, than the words ‘so help me God’ from every presidential oath since 1789, or than the prayer that has opened every congressional session of legislative business since 1787.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance#Legal_challenges

        Also, the US print religious indoctrination on their currency: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not arguing for religion to be in school. I’m just saying what’s there is already bad enough without making stuff up.

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Its also said “with liberty and justice for all” during a time where people kept literal slaves, without a hint of irony.

      The wording far too inconsistent and vague to be taken as literally as you’re attempting to take them.