Horrible voter outreach.

  • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    6 months ago

    For the last few years, I just reply to everything with some raunchy furry porn, whatever I have on-hand on my phone, followed by ‘stop’. Most are just automated, but now and again an actual person will reply, and it brings me joy. You didn’t ask for gay furry bondage porn, I didn’t ask to be bothered. An eye for an eye and all that…

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah, even texting STOP is still giving them what they want - they included that to trick people who would otherwise ignore it into verifying their existence.

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      That is fun for the person who just had their phone number spoofed by the people who sent the spam, and now received furry porn from some random idiot.

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        shrug complain to your government about cracking down on number spoofing (something they absolutely have the ability to end at basically a moments notice, but haven’t, because there’s little incentive). Until then, furry dicks.

    • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Enjoy while you can. Places like California are cracking down on unsolicited pics like that. No matter what we feel about unsolicited political texts (I can’t unsubscribe, can you?), we can’t send shit like that back without getting sued.

      I’ve changed it up and ask them to bring ductape, hacksaws and some stretch and Flex hefty bags. We’ve got a body to dispose of.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        TIL!

        depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and that, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

        Gotta ask their lawyer about artistic political furry porn

        • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, all my replies are “art”, not just two people banging. I mean, they are still banging, but it’s drawn. Lewdly, and in detail. But artistically.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          What if we send pics of Manet’s Olympia? That painting was considered scandalous in its time, but it’s classified as fine art now.

          Or sending classical nude figures, or kouros figures(ancient Greek sculptures of nude men.) That could be fun, and confusing.

        • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So how does this differ from sending unsolicited dick pics? Do people have a right to express their penises via text?