• frickineh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    ·
    7 months ago

    Surprise surprise, her doctorate is in psychology. She works with special ed kids and I’m guessing she’s either decided or parents are self-reporting that they’re “vaccine injured.” 🙄 What an asshole.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      7 months ago

      “My little Johnny was a perfect student until the medical establishment gave him a learning disability!”

      This seems to overlap psychologically with the “my child can do no wrong” crowd, the ones who blame teachers, coaches, librarians, video games, sugar, red dye, gluten, participation trophies, or pretty much anyone or anything except themselves for their child’s problems. The common thread is a profound lack of self-awareness.

      On the anti-vaccination issue, there’s also a hefty dose of misinformation from people who are making money from selling the idea to gullible people, but there’s definitely a certain psychological profile who falls for it most often.

      • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        7 months ago

        I feel like a lot of these parents are also doing the insidious thing of trying to justify that it isn’t “their genes” that are responsible. Like having Autism or something in your family is a dirty secret and “taints” their “family line”.

      • shyguyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        My aunt (worst human I’ve ever met) thinks the red dye thing is true too… Where do these people get their shit from!?

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    7 months ago

    Her (almost certainly) describing a sibling with autism as being “vaccine-injured” is just so insulting.

  • shininghero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 months ago

    Weren’t some states instituting book bans for subjects considered “harmful”? This seems like a prime opportunity to twist some poorly written state laws and do some actual good with them.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’m not sure this book has actually been published in physical media, but I agree.

      No I am wrong, you can buy it on Amazon.

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      No. States were removing books from school libraries based on content, though. I always feel a bit bitter when I research something and realize I’ve been misled. Book banning isn’t really allowed.

      While this book existing is whatever, it shouldn’t be in any school. Hopefully no public libraries either.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have a distant cousin who was totally destroyed by measles. According to her mom, she was 6 years old and a very bright kid, very eager to learn. Her siblings recovered, but she didn’t. I mean, she recovered as far as surviving, but she’s in her late 50s now with the mental capacity of a toddler.

        Her family lived in a one room shack deep in Appalachia from the 50s through the 80s. Going to the doctor wasn’t something they did unless they were dying. They managed to get her to the hospital once it became clear she likely wasn’t going to make it.

        I met her in the early 2000s and different family members take turns caring for her. She talks but it’s mostly just going with what a person says. “Sheila, I heard you were a millionaire!” “Yeah, yeah. I got millions dollars. Yeah.” “Can I get a few thousand?” “Sure, yeah, sure, a few thousand. Yep. Mmhmmm.”

        Her brother used to mess with her at the store her mom worked at. “Hey Shiela, you hate that ugly bastard that just walked in here don’t you?” “Yep. Mmhmm. I hate that ugly bastard.” “Awww Sheila, you hate me and think I’m ugly?” “Noooooooo. Nuh uh. Nooooo!” “Yes you do, now tell him!” “Yep, mmhmm, I do.”

        I hate that happened to her.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, or living with the knowledge that they infected friends who couldn’t get the vaccines for medical reasons.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 months ago

    First time I’m hearing about “vaccine injured” meaning they think a vaccine caused autism or something. When I read the post, with the context, I thought it meant like a physical injury that someone with special needs might suffer if they moved around during a vaccine. It’s actually disgusting that this person wrote a story likely about a kid with some form of neurodivergence and called toted them as a “vaccine injured child”.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s from a long debunked paper. Anyone claiming any correlation between vaccines and autism is willfully ignorant at this point.

      • HyperMegaNet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        7 months ago

        It looks suspiciously like a pay-for-award company that gives out awards to just about any product for parents/educators/related to children or parenting, as long as you pay the “application fee” (although they specifically say an award isn’t guaranteed).

        I mean looking at their website they seem to give out an awful lot of awards, and they mention that for $500, you’ll get to use their award seal on your product and receive 100 award stickers, and for $1,500 you get more stickers, plus they’ll post about your product on their website.

        Call me crazy, but I’d think that if an award isn’t guaranteed, they’d make you pay for the initial application to start with, and then (assuming you “win” an award) they’d offer to promote your product for an additional payment, once they’ve decided that you’re eligible. The fact that they talk so openly about how paying a larger application fee gets you promoted on their site (and some other stuff) makes it seem suspiciously like a pay-for-award scheme to me.

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago
          • For Level Two applications that don’t meet the criteria for an award, a refund is issued for the licensing portion of the application fee less any applied discounts. An award is not guaranteed. Marketing and publicty benefits are only extended to applicants who meet the criteria for the award.

          Apparently they’ll only feature you if you’re eligible for an award and refund you the enhanced part of the application if you’re product is ineligible. They do have the criteria for eligibility further down the page and it seems pretty open to interpretation.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    7 months ago

    WTF is “Gold Moms Choice Award”? The newest warning label?

    If the Americans are so keen about banning books, they should really start with this one. Ever thought about “What if books could kill?” - This one can.

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      It sounds like a bit of an award scam actually - there’s a disappointed recipient taking about it here.

      I don’t think there’s a lot of legal stuff around awards - you can pretty much just make one up and give it to things.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        Winners who pay $500 may use the Mom’s Choice Awards seal “for marketing and promotional purposes” BUT must pay the $1500 fee to actually put the seal on the books. Unless you purchase the stick on seals, 100 for $50.00.

        Yeah, that’s definitely a scam.

        • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hooray! - It’s a great honour to receive this award :)

          Incidentally, I’d like to present you with the MOMU* Award Gold Trophy for Comment Excellence🏆


          *MOMU = My Own Made Up Award

    • Fontasia@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      If memory serves correctly The Daily Wire invented their own awards just to say their journalism is “Award Winning”

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve met this kind of awards somewhere. One supermarket chain boasted that one of their businesses won the “Supermarket of the Year” award. And the next year it was again that one of their locations won that price. So I dug a bit deeper and learned that they own the local version of “Supermarket of the Year” award, and only markets of their own chain “participate”.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          I recently went on a drive from Indiana to Minnesota and back, doing a different route each time. Almost every hospital we passed said it was one of the 100 best hospitals according to (I think) U.S. News and World Report.

          What are the chances?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Gold Moms

      Imagining a big pot of molten gold, and a middle aged woman in one of those perfect blonde helmet hair cuts slowly dipping her elderly mother into it, while laughing and screaming about how “I’m going to post you to instagram! I’m going to treasure you forever!”

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      see? she’s a scientist, therefore she knows what she’s talking about!

      you aren’t going to question your own precious science, are you, liberal? didn’t you know all scientists study the same thing?

    • Vox_Ursus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      How does being a psychologist constitute a reasonable qualification to have any weight on the matter? Vaccinations belong to the field of pharmacology, on which psychologists have no training whatsoever (possibly aside from psychiatric drugs) and if they do, they’re most likely a psychiatrist, in which case they’re doctor first and psychologist second.

      The author has no qualifications whatsoever to talk about vaccines, aside from her doctoral dissertation, which I would consider questionable at best.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Here’s the program she got her PsyD from.

      She’s a psychologist, not a psychiatrist, so she has no training in pharmacology. Requirements for her program say nothing about organic chemistry.

      I wonder if her program would be happy about her using her degree to make medical claims, considering it isn’t a medical degree.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 months ago

    I realize this is sort of an aside, but the title reminds me of the “children’s” book that Colbert put out back when he was doing the Colbert Report.

    It’s about the adventures of a pole and its many uses. Including by strippers. It’s actually surprisingly wholesome.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly, that would be preferable to the reality. Unvaccinated children, by and large, aren’t the people who suffer from their parents’ shitty choices. I wouldn’t want anyone to suffer, but if it were the unvaccinated children who suffer most, it would be easier to make the case to ignorant and selfish people who don’t want to vaccinate.

      No vaccine is completely effective, and each infection is an opportunity for mutation and spread. Not everyone who gets infected will get sick. Not everyone who gets sick will have severe illness or even the same symptoms. The people who suffer the most are the very young, the immunocompromised, the elderly, and the poor. If you’re talking to someone who thinks their internet googling is as valid as actual medical doctors doing actual scientific research, it’s going to be harder to convince them to do something for the greater good.

  • YungOnions@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    So I went on Amazon and there it is, sitting at 186 5 star reviews. WTF. Genuine question: is there some way of reporting shit like this to Amazon? I can’t see anything obvious.