Fox News won’t bother mentioning this to their viewers.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    248
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every time we elect a Republican president we have to start rolling the ball all the way back up the hill again. Every goddamn time.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      161
      ·
      6 months ago

      Good news! Apparently a lot of excitingly new young progressives are mad we haven’t rolled it back up high enough and are refusing to help!

      Wait. Okay, not good news. Sorry.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Because they’re not rolling it up fast enough! Can’t you see? They just have to roll it faster and preferably all the way and then I’ll get excited and help. Yup. Until then I’ll be adding ankle weights to you too. And don’t forget it’s all your fault too.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They just don’t recognize that they’ll be crushed first when it rolls back. Maturity is learning not to commit all of your attention to the top of the mountain, but to always be mindful of the boulder.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 months ago

            Maturity is learning not to commit all of your attention to the top of the mountain, but to always be mindful of the boulder.

            That is beautiful and so very true.

          • xantoxis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            I chuckled at the first commenter’s description of this as a boulder, but honestly the metaphor is pretty robust.

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            They are getting crushed anyway.

            Even without “both sides”, the situation worldwide is fucked. And “neither side” is going to change much. Yes, one is worse, but the better side still offers a bandaid over a gushing wound.

            So I don’t really blame them.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              We just need to help them understand the system better. I voted third-party when was young, and many of my friends abstained. That was due to a lack of education about our government. It’s not about swaying them to vote one way or the other, but just to help them understand how our system functions. After that, if they want to vote for Trump with conviction, so be it. At least it’ll be an informed decision.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I will say it: fuck the system.

                The sooner it’s gone, the better.

                It won’t be pretty, but this isn’t leading us to paradise either, we are killing the planet and can’t even take the foot off the gas.

                We need a hard reset, and it’s coming. In the best scenario, the system is taken down before the enviromental collapse.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Are you an accelerationist? Do you believe making things worse faster will lead to systemic change for the better?

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yep. Just vote and don’t expect to get to the top. We’re never getting there. We just vote and vote and vote and then eventually we die, pushing the same boulder the entire time.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s far from ideal, but the problem is that we let it roll back every 4-8 years. If Democrats consistently won due to progressive policies, the candidates would inevitably become more progressive to capture more of the constituency. Disengagement and disenfranchisement consistently cause the boulder to fall, leading to the lack of overall progress.

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                And because that doesn’t happen, I just have to assume that Americans aren’t nearly as progressive as everybody on the Internet thinks they are.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Don’t underestimate the efficacy of voter disenfranchisement and disengagement. Republicans don’t need to prop up Trump. People who loath him will vote for him simply due to party loyalty. Discrediting Biden is all it takes for a win.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It would be nice if they actually rolled it back up at all instead of just putting a chock block in to keep it in place until a Republican comes along.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    6 months ago

    Kudos to the paper for adding “trump appointed” in the headline - it’s relevant and too often the context is left out.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeh, but the late fees are good for people. Free market and free market. Drain the swamp etc. Just pay your debt on time. Or something, both side the same, yada yada.

    A great example of the current presidency trying to do something good for a lot of people.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s funny that the literal industry posterboy for not paying debts on time his entire career is now leading that crowd of “just pay your debts” 😂 He still isn’t doing it himself, even with other people putting up the money to pay his debts for him

    • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      6 months ago

      In case anybody doesn’t already know this, the Chamber of Commerce is a non-governmental organization of private (and also publicly traded) business owners that just sounds like it’s part of the government.

      • dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        This ruling is a major win for responsible consumers who pay their credit card bills on time and businesses that want to provide affordable credit,” U.S. Chamber of Commerce Litigation Center Counsel Maria Monaghan said in a statement.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s the same rationale they used when they tried to stop student loan forgiveness. But they accuse the left of having the mentality of crabs in a bucket.

          • DeprecatedCompatV2@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well, forgiving a bunch of debt without fixing the problem isn’t going to stop the leak. You can fully expect that bailing out debtors will result in lenders offering riskier loans they expect to be forgiven. With schools turning into a debt-selling industry, buying that debt from private lenders using public money would be robbing not only the tax payer, but also the next generation of the opportunity for an education. You can’t buy your way out of problem that isn’t caused by cost (hint: greed).

            All that to say, there should be debt caps on education before any kind of broad forgiveness. Or just federally subsidize up to a certain amount and then no one will go to pricier schools except those who can afford to without hardship.

  • neo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s crazy how political courts have become. Or didn’t I notice it in the past?

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Courts have always had a bias towards the status quo and moneyed interests. The Warren court was a historical aberration.

    • Jollyllama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know if this is political or just downright croneyism. He made the ruling because somewhere someone is getting paid by debt companies who don’t want to lose money. This is beyond politics since its infected both sides of the aisle, this is just corruption. We need campaign finance reform and a ban on lobbying.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it’s worse than ever, but I’ve only got my own observations to go on and not a fair study.