Summary made with perplexity.ai: The CIA played a key role in spreading Abstract Expressionism and its ideology worldwide to combat the opposing style of Socialist Realism and, by extension, communist culture at large. The CIA saw Abstract Expressionism as an opportunity to promote American culture and values worldwide. The agency employed covert methods to make Abstract Expressionism so popular that it became quite difficult for an artist to find success working in any other style. The Congress for Cultural Freedom, an organization funded by the CIA, gave the agency the ideal front to promote its covert interest in Abstract Expressionism.

Some links from which this summary comes from: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html https://www.thecollector.com/abstract-expressionism-waging-a-cultural-cold-war-2/ https://www.theartstory.org/movement/socialist-realism/ https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artcurious-cia-art-excerpt-1909623 https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/why-did-the-cia-sponsor-jackson-pollock/

It’s crazy to think how much CIA shaped the path of art, if all that is true. They may also have influenced in the popularization of avant-garde American classical music composers, like John Cage. I wonder to which extent CIA is responsible for the widespread of American-made cultural products, like pop music, rock and fast foods, and which artistic or cultural movements became influential throught artifficial means (instead of organically become succesful due to artistic merit).

An additional note: a similar thing may have happened internally in Brazil. I once heard that the Brazilian musical genre “Sertanejo Universitário”, that skyrocketed in popularity during the 2000s and early 2010s to become one of the most popular Brazilian musical genres, may have owe part of this success to a funding from the big agribusiness players, which aimed to strengthen their monopoly over small poducers, or smothing like that.

  • pyska@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Expressionist art never made sense to me. Like, someone made a couple of pseudo-random brush strokes over a canvas and… people liked it? I thought, is this what art is? Never would have guessed the CIA had their hands in this, however, in retrospect, it does make sense they would want to try and do this. Just boggles my mind that they succeeded.

    On the flip side, TIL there is such a thing such as “Socialist Realism”. I wouldn’t mind it one bit if this style came back to replace “banana duct-taped into wall”-type of “art”.

    • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      but u silly silly tankie, you have to realize that the art style heavily pushing individualism apolitical self interpretation of the scribbles thoughtful brushwork is truly free and correct and won purely thanks to it’s CIA funding and astroturfing own merit

      not like some state mandated ebil totalitarian “”““art””" that actually holds a message specifically to indoctrinate the masses, i though am happily IMMUNE to propaganda 😤

          • pyska@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nope, 🇵🇹. Did “xD” originate from 🇵🇱? I kinda just saw it somewhere and started using it. :)

            • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Generally “xD” is something that is extremely prominant in Polish texting and internet culture, it didn’t really die down in 2010’s like in the rest of the internet.

              Sometimes some people react to funny stuff while laughing by saying “iks de” literally, fucking speaking the laughing emoji xD

              So because of that, it’s quite a giveaway of anyone writing in english and attaching “xD”, that they might be from Poland.

    • GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s reductive to say that it’s “pseudo-random brush strokes”. There’s a bizarre level of sophistication and regularity to Jackson Pollock when analyzed mathematically.

      That doesn’t mean I enjoy Pollock’s art, as I absolutely do not, but some other expressionism is more fun if you look into it.