There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good thing we’re off to a great start showing unity by calling allies “idiots”…

    Don’t be an asshole and seemingly purposefully misrepresent what people say. That’s far more harmful than anyone being called an idiot. Practice what your preach if you’re so high and mighty with speech.

    … and discarding the lives of Palestinians and immigrants

    Where am I discarding their lives? Please, point to it. I’ve only said things that say they need us to vote or things will be worse for them. Stop strawmaning me and sealioning. If Trump gets elected they’re going to be massacred. Trump will endorse the genocide and he’ll also ramp up anti-immigrant actions. Sure, Biden sucks but he does speak out against Israeli actions now and they are trying to limit some support.

    If voting is best, so be it, but fuck right off with being so callous as to refer to it as “harm reduction”

    I didn’t call it that, but what would you call it? Its something that decreases the amount of damage that’s being done while not fully resolving the issue. It’s reducing the effects of something harmful. It’s harm reduction.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s not what harm reduction is. That’s never how the term’s been applied. I know language can change, but abruptly fabricating an opposite meaning in an attempt to dodge consequences for one’s bad actions (potentially losing a campaign due to one’s undying dedication to genocide and fascism) is not an appropriate treatment of the term.