Also, take it from a squid- clams don’t meditate. They’re big gooey messes of anxiety in a shell.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Looks like an anti-Spotify ad to me. Why should Spotify employees read the names of people’s playlists?

    Edit: oh, they’re probably public ones. Still, technically profiting off people’s content, which they likely agreed to in ToS.

    • arudesalad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That seems like something that could be easily taken just from the api, I feel like if it’s data anyone can get for free, they are fine to use it in ads.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I mean, the users probably didn’t read the ToS but lots of social media and similar have these rules. I feel they should ask for every instance they use individual data for advertising their platform anyway even if the user clicked “Agree” when signing up. ToS;DR calls this “You sign away moral rights”.