A Louisiana man has been sentenced to decades in prison and physical castration after pleading guilty to raping a teenager, according to a news release from the region’s district attorney.

Glenn Sullivan Sr., 54, pled guilty to four counts of second-degree rape on April 17. Authorities began investigating Sullivan in July 2022, when a young woman told the Livingston Parish Sheriff’s Office that Sullivan had assaulted her multiple times when she was 14. The assaults resulted in pregnancy, and a DNA test confirmed that Sullivan was the father of the child, the district attorney’s office said. Sullivan had also groomed the victim and threatened her and her family to prevent her from coming forward.

A 2008 Louisiana law says that men convicted of certain rape offenses may be sentenced to chemical castration. They can also elect to be physically castrated. Perrilloux said that Sullivan’s plea requires he be physically castrated. The process will be carried out by the state’s Department of Corrections, according to the law, but cannot be conducted more than a week before a person’s prison sentence ends. This means Sullivan wouldn’t be castrated until a week before the end of his 50-year sentence — when he would be more than 100 years old.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 months ago

    Look, this guy is obviously a monster, but castrating someone doesn’t undo the harm. That’s just barbaric. Hard labor making license plates all day? Sure. Long sentence? I could see that.

    We gotta have some moral minimums, though. Stuff like execution and castration is too far. What if they have the wrong guy? Even if it was him, mutilating their bodies is not what we should be doing on this continent.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wouldn’t this be considered “cruel or unusual punishment” which is banned by the constitution?

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes.

        Let’s not cheer a society that cuts off the balls of rapists, just like we don’t cheer for societies that cut off the hands of thieves.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Even if they get it right, castration is never an acceptable punishment in a civilized society.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Some people seem to wish they lived in “biblical times”. Slavery, senseless violence, all powerful monarchs. No thank you very much, I prefer my civilizations to progress forward.

          • franglais@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Living in a civilised society comes with conditions, when you break that contract, you defile another, you lose the right to be part of that society, and do not merit its protections. Chemical castration is an option. All of you downvoters have never had personal experience with rapists, or, simply have zero empathy.

      • ours@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Vengeance isn’t justice and one barbaric act shouldn’t be met with another one.

        • franglais@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, we should slap them on the wrist, give them early parole and let them loose to do it again.

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Taking away someone’s freedom isn’t a slap on the wrist. We cant resort to barbarism, call it justice and consider ourselves better than those we put on trial.

            The justice system being imperfect is an argument for incarceration as opposed to maiming or killing criminals. One can be somewhat undone, the other one can’t.