• protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 months ago

    I believe TikTok is being banned because as it stands now it brings topics outside the limits of allowed discussion to a lot of eyes in ways US government/companies haven’t proven able to control

    I mean, if this were true, that would mean you wouldn’t be able to find similar content on Western platforms. Are you really saying similar content isn’t readily available on YouTube? If so, what content?

    • GrymEdm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      That’s a solid criticism and I upvoted. I hadn’t thought about YouTube. Anecdotally I’ve had factual comments about how many kids are killed, what Israeli politicians say, etc. auto-moderated into oblivion on YouTube. But at the same time I get a lot of the facts I use from YouTube (basically never been on TikTok) so it holds water. I also get a lot of info from other sources, but I can’t think of something specific I’d get from them that I could never find on YouTube.

      In my defense, I’m basing my opinion on why TikTok is particularly targeted on interviews like this one with Ted Cruz. He talks about how TikTok is specifically designed to push messages that are harmful to America, including what he calls pro-Hamas content but I suspect is actually anti-Israeli policy, pro-Palestine content. That is why I would argue there’s some evidence of a campaign against TikTok in particular that might skip over YouTube or other major platforms. Perhaps the Western powers feel that YouTube is still acceptably moderated towards their interests whereas TikTok isn’t. Perhaps Google is just too influential domestically.

      Edit: I found a video I was looking for: Biden talking about passing the TikTok/Israel funding/Ukraine funding package. A bit of language he uses that I think is telling is “it continues America’s leadership in the world and everyone knows it” which could signal US dominance as a motivation and thus TikTok as a target and not US companies.

      That doesn’t mean your point isn’t worth discussion, or that my points aren’t opinion. I’m interested to see how it develops. I’ve based my opinion on the conversations I can find and language used, but I’m open to adjusting my view if evidence prompts that.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I think this ban is completely agnostic re: content. The issue is more fundamental – it’s fully owned and operated by people in China. This is a geopolitical battle that is currently playing out across many industries. Social media grabs headlines where less sexy industry battles do not.

        I think Tom Nicholas gives a great overview.

        Also, fuck Ted Cruz with a 20 inch dildo. Don’t take anything that sniveling carcass has to say seriously.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          it’s fully owned and operated by people in China

          US private equity firms own more than anyone. WSJ: What Is TikTok Worth? Some Say $20 Billion, Others Say $100 Billion

          [ByteDance founder] Zhang owns 20% of ByteDance, according to the company, though super shares have given him larger voting rights. Roughly 60% of ByteDance is owned by global institutional investors including Carlyle Group, General Atlantic and Susquehanna International Group. The remaining 20% is owned by company employees.

          The CEO is Singaporean Shou Zi Chew and the VP is American Michael Beckerman.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            TikTok is a subsidiary of ByteDance, and that the Chinese government exerts significant political influence over ByteDance really is not a question

        • Marketsupreme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s a many birds with one stone situation - an industrial battle, a move to monopolize for Facebook after years of lobbying, Censorship etc.

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 months ago

      For one the YouTube algorithm is absolute dog shit compared to TT, which is literally the gold standard at this point.

      If you haven’t tried, you’re seriously missing out. It’s legit incredible how good it is. I hardly use it because I prefer long-form content (and don’t honestly have much time) but I absolutely can respect what they created

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Western SM is already in the pocket of the state and any content that goes against their values is suppressed.

      Pro-Palestinian content on Tiktok can easily get traction and receive over hundreds of thousands, if not millions of views.

      Considering that younger people are not watching regular media news, channels like fox just do not have comparative reach and they aren’t buying into the zionist propaganda like previous generations.

      There are a lot of content creators who are articulate, succinct and organisation has come out of it. People have created sites & apps that list all corporations and products to boycott because of their support for Israel and it’s had an impact.

      Sure, TTs algorithm can easily push you down unpleasant rabbit holes but that’s the nature of algorithms, not just specific to TT.

      So there might be similar content on western SM but it’s being held down and isn’t showing on people feed ‘organically’.