plsgimmefrogs [they/he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196English · 7 months agoRulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1645
arrow-up1645imageRulelemmy.dbzer0.complsgimmefrogs [they/he]@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196English · 7 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarepsud@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoSo your “their teeth were good due to different microflora” can be simplified to “their teeth were good because they didn’t have tooth damaging food”
minus-squareDaxtron2@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoThe original claim was dental issues were generally a death sentence, which was true whether or not they’re more common now.
So your “their teeth were good due to different microflora” can be simplified to “their teeth were good because they didn’t have tooth damaging food”
The original claim was dental issues were generally a death sentence, which was true whether or not they’re more common now.