• Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s usually * Russia/China does something horrific *

    Normal People: Hey, this is pretty terrible.

    Tankies: IT’S NOT TERRIBLE BECAUSE WHAT USA DID IS MUCH WORSE.

    In 98% of my Encounter with Tankies, they are the one who try to steer the topic away from the horrible thing China/Russia has done and towards: LOOK USA BAD! Even if the USA has NOTHING to do with the topic at all. It’s like that’s their go-to argument. And of course: " Yeah, it’s not bad because the puppet States of China and/or Russia said it’s not bad. "

    • SloganLessons@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They usually skip the morality and jump straight to the whataboutism. They know that the thing is bad and won’t argue that, but they will try to sweep it under the rug and change the narrative to US doing something bad too.

      At the end of the day they’re like kids in a playground justifying that they can do something bad because someone else did it too.

      Oh and I can tell that someone will misinterpret my comment and think I’m downplaying the sh*t that the US did

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Marx was of Jewish descent himself, and argued for the liberation of Jewish people. He brutally took down one of the most anti-semetic pieces of his time, The Jewish Question, in his essay On The Jewish Question. Bauer argued for forcing Jewish people to deconvert in The Jewish Question.

          In On the Jewish Question, Marx argues that Religion has played a terrible role in supporting the ruling class, whether that be the aristocracy in Feudalism or the Bourgeoisie in Capitalism, but ultimately argues that this is not an issue of ethnicity, but Mode of Production, and that antisemitism is abhorant.

          You don’t have to be a Marxist, but trying to paint a Jewish man as antisemetic, that argued against some of the most antisemetic contemporaries of his time, is historical revisionism.