I’ll note that right now, this is a seasonal issue, associated with moderate springtime temperatures when there is a lot of sunshine available.

  • Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh no! Not an excess of available power! How will the state ever recover from such a catastrophe?

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 months ago

      I hope it doesn’t spill into the water, permeate the air, or leave the land uninhabitable for thousands of years.

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        7 months ago

        No. They constantly monitor it and keep it in line. The power grid itself is totally fine. Completely.

        The only “problem” is they cannot easily turn on or off huge old power plants, so if the sun is blazing, they might have to direct excess old generation power to batteries or other grids.

        The only “problem” is the power companies don’t get to charge much for simply managing the grid. They charge mostly for power generation, so it ends up costing them money. If they were simply a government paid service, they wouldn’t have to care what so ever which direction power is flowing as long as it has somewhere to go.

        • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          The main power company in CA (PG&E) has built tons of other things into the bills aside from power generation, so I expect my bill (which has gone up 300% since 2018) to continue to climb despite this.

          • ares35@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            my utility charges $25 a month just to be hooked up. then there’s taxes and some community bullshit fees on top of the actual electricity usage. so even though my usage has dropped quite a bit over the years, and the base rate hasn’t really gone up that much (about 10-12% total, over two decades)… my bill is still more than double what it used to be.

          • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Seriously, i found an old bill from a decade ago, it was like $54 for my 1 BR apartment. It’s now usually over triple that…

          • sudo42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            PG&E charges me more to deliver power ($0.18/kWh) than it does to generate ($0.12/kWh) that power. That’s f’ed up.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Kind of, yeah. But excess solar can be turned off almost instantly so it isn’t like it’s an impossible problem.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, various power generation techniques (e.g., big industrial power plants) do not want to run without a load. And switching them off temporarily isn’t really feasible (shutting them for good would ultimately be nice, but that’s another topic…).

        And you can’t just “dump” huge amounts of excess of power — it needs to go somewhere.