Image text: “Fact: 90% of Linux users switch back to windows right before all their problems are about to be fixed”

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            NixOS is semi-immutable but not really designed to be user friendly. I think we are more talking about Universal Blue, Fedora SilberBlur, OpenSUSE microOS, VanillaOS and so on.

            • jnk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 months ago

              Tbh I’m pretty new to nixos, but I’m starting to believe if we had that the exact same config (at least without flakes, I’m still having trouble undertanding them) but with a slightly abstracted UI, it would be one of the most user-friendly distros out there.

              Like just imagine being able to click “Add program”, write the name of a program, having all the options appear below as dropdown menus or on/off switches, then click big blue button “Apply” to rebuild.

            • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              And steamdeckOS… whenever valve decides they’re gonna release it for general use.

              • Grass@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Apart from the game mode update notes being hard coded to show steamos updates, bazzite is a drop in replacement that doesn’t get rid of your non flatpak packages each update. It also bundles or has easy installation options for all the recommended third party software everyone uses with the deck.

    • svnipni@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I still boot to windows every now and then to play games. But each time windows painfully reminds me why I hate it

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have never liked Windows. Unix workstations or linux pretty much since the mid 80’s. My current pet peeve is companies that block email clients except Outlook from connecting to their mail server (Exchange).

  • the16bitgamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is true, I wanted to play a game and it looked broken in Linux. When I went back to Windows I discovered that it was a problem with the game. Then I went back to Linux and it ran better than it did in Windows.

    Typical Ubisoft experience.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean, if you duel boot, it’s just a matter of time until Windows nukes your other OS. At least with me, my Linux was about to solve world peace, but Windows got wind of that and shut it the fuck down.

    Meme is correct, they’re coming for you.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 months ago

      I almost wanted to correct you and say its dual not duel, but when I think about it windows will fight to be the only bootloader right when you think its finally behaving.

      • N4CHEM@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wanted to say the same: the typo made the comment better. There has to be a community for this.

    • Doxin@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      Windows basically never nukes the actual linux install. It DOES like breaking the bootloader though. Which is fixable but still deeply annoying.

      • svnipni@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ah damn this is exactly what happened a few days ago. My popos boot entry suddenly disappeared. I can still just boot from the physical ssd it’s installed on, but I found it strange it just pooped out somehow. Any pointers on how to fix it?

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I still need to fix mine, thanks for the link. The weirdest break it did once was messing with my Wi-Fi driver, managed to break Linux’ driver somehow, making the Internet a no go. Still no idea how Windows managed that though, they shouldn’t be messing with my bios. :/

        • Doxin@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I haven’t had it happen to me for a while now. I used to have a boot repair liveCD that’d always do the trick, but I don’t think that specific distro even exists anymore.

          The gist is you’ll want to boot a liveCD and use the liveCD to reinstall GRUB, I’m sure you can find the right incantation to do so online somewhere.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Reminded me how Windows would set the hardware clock to different timezone that Linux uses, can’t remember which.

      It would make my blood boil, that’s when I decided to never boot it again. 100% Linux everywhere, I get it on routers when I can.

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        In terms of stability and packages, it’s an amazing OS. Gone are the days of being afraid that of updates or system upgrades that might leave your system borked. Unless you’re experimenting with filesystems and boot parameters, it’s not straightforward to fuck things up.

        On the flipside, by Linus is it difficult to get things working as a beginner. Good luck packaging new stuff, good luck creating new options, good luck cross-compiling, good luck configuring stuff with hardcoded config paths in /var/ or whatever, actually good luck understanding how to configure existing packages, good luck getting any kind of PR merged without the say-so of a chosen few, good luck changing anything in the community without getting past the gatekeepers, and have fun understanding why some random package is being installed and/or compiled when you switch to a new configuration.

        Anti Commercial-AI license

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Good luck packaging new stuff

          Packaging is generally hard on any distro.

          Compared to a traditional distro, the packaging difficulty distribution is quite skewed with Nix though as packages that follow common conventions are quite a lot easier to package due to the abstractions Nixpkgs has built for said conventions while some packages are near impossible to package due to the unique constraints Nix (rightfully) enforces.

          good luck creating new options

          Creating options is really simple actually. Had I known you could do that earlier, I would have done so when I was starting out.

          Creating good options APIs is an art to be mastered but you don’t need to do that to get something going.

          good luck cross-compiling

          Have you ever tried cross-compiling on a traditional distro? Cross-compiling using Nixpkgs is quite easy in comparison.

          actually good luck understanding how to configure existing packages

          Yeah, no way to do so other than to read the source.

          It’s usually quite understandable without knowing the exact details though; just look at the function arguments.

          Also beats having no option to configure packages at all. Good luck slightly modifying an Arch package. It has no abstractions for this whatsoever; you have to copy and edit the source. Oh and you need to keep it up to date yourself too.

          Gentoo-like standardised flags would be great and are being worked on.

          good luck getting any kind of PR merged without the say-so of a chosen few

          Hi, one of the “chosen few” here: That’s a security feature.

          Not a particularly good one, mind you, but a security feature nonetheless.

          There’s also now a merge bot now running in the wild allowing maintainers of packages to merge automatic updates on their maintained packages though which alleviates this a bit.

          have fun understanding why some random package is being installed and/or compiled when you switch to a new configuration.

          It can be mysterious sometimes but once you know the tools, you can directly introspect the dependency tree that is core to the concept of Nix and figure out exactly what’s happening.

          I’m not aware of the existence of any such tools in traditional distros though. What do you do on i.e. Arch if your hourly shot of -Syu goes off and fetches some package you’ve never seen before due to an update to some other package? Manually look at PKGBUILDs?

      • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, that’s what I i did, first tried Nobara, I liked it but encountered some issues, tried to fix them but I realized I spent too much time and there’s no clear fix, so I hoped on Fedora and everything works nicely, exept for the Multimedia drivers which I’m still trying to fix…

        • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Seriously, how can a huge distro like Fedora still be so horribly user-unfriendly when it comes to basic things like multimedia playback.

          • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s the stupid US patent law, and they don’t wanna deal with any “legal” issues, showing you how to install those drivers is how far they can go… But this is Exactly why these drivers are broken, they’re not well integrated and not tested by Fedora devs…

            That’s why Distros like Ultramarine promise you a working Fedora experience OOTB, because they’re not US based and such laws don’t apply to their software…

        • digdug@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is what seems to have helped for me on Fedora:

          1. Install free and non-free RPM Fusion repositories: https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration

          2. Then run the following:

            sudo dnf groupupdate multimedia --setop="install_weak_deps=False" --exclude=PackageKit-gstreamer-plugin
            sudo dnf groupupdate sound-and-video
            sudo dnf install mozilla-openh264
            rm ~/.cache/gstreamer-1.0/registry.x86_64.bin
            
            

          I was having trouble with many h265 videos until I cleared my gstreamer cache (I only needed to clear the 64-bit cache, this thread suggests clearing both 32 and 64-bit):
          https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/h265-videos-wont-play-in-totem-after-installing-all-codecs/87341/17

  • tearsintherain@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Every child should be introduced to linux. Will help them understand better they don’t need to be treated as products and certainly make them more computer literate, and hopefully more security conscious.

    • MenacingPerson@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      But to be honest, not every child is technologically-inclined. Most are just gonna get annoyed and hate it. This is not a good idea.

      I’d have loved it as a child though

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Something like Linux Mint is very easy to use and doesn’t require much maintenance. You don’t need to reformat every year or two either when Windows inevitably shits itself.

          • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            My point is Linux doesn’t have to be hard to use. You are going out of your way and making things difficult when using something like Arch Linux.

            • MenacingPerson@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m not undermining your point in the first sentence, I was just saying that I use arch, btw

              Linux mint shares a few ubuntu bugs, and even if you use LMDE someone like a child cannot understand the essence of linux in a controlled environment.

              I’ll repeat. You cannot teach linux in a controlled environment to a child.

              • Moorshou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’ve heard of cases where parents are putting kids in front of linux recently!

                They are windows illiterate i think is what the kids posted.

              • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Yes you can! What do you think a Chromebook is or an Android tablet. Modern Linux is quite easy to use, in some areas easier than modern Windows. This is especially true if you have the kind of children who get viruses all the time.

                • MenacingPerson@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Oh awesome. Leave it to lemmy to be pedantic.

                  I obviously meant normal linux distros when I referred to linux. Not chromebooks or android.

                  Also, using those is in no way the same as learning linux. In a chrome book you’ll just be using a browser. In a phone, all the apps are locked down and you have no access to cli.

          • pewgar_seemsimandroid
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            thanks you for not forcing people to use arch, now I don’t have to shit on it for a milliont time

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      But the same can be said with windows. My life long windows user friend occasionally (a few times a year) reaches out about some significant issues they are experiencing with windows on their modern desktop.

      I truly wouldn’t recommend Linux for a fairly tech illiterate person like him, but really Linux is better in every category that matters to me.

      • jnk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I truly wouldn’t recommend Linux for a fairly tech illiterate person like him

        I would actually argue the opposite, linux is way more intuitive for new people who hasn’t used a pc before or hasn’t used windows long enough to fill their brain with their unconsistent mess. I’ve seen 3 variants of this already with people close to me ( last one of them encouraged by me). Kinda mind boggling.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          The moment a new user needs to use command line, they are out.

          It isn’t mind boggling at all.

          • jnk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Untrue statement plus in some distros you don’t need the terminal at all. Fear to the terminal is included in windows’ inconsistent mess, as i said, to real first time users it’s not that horrible to “talk to the pc so it does what you told it to do”.

            Also you don’t get to decide if an experience i had felt mind boggling or not (?

        • Zetta@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean he’s tech illiterate when it comes to anything semi complicated but with the way he uses his pc and the software he uses it would just not be possible for him to switch at all, would be unable to do 70% of the stuff he wants to do.

          Linux is only good for the truly tech illiterate/pretty noice users in my opinion. After that you hit a point where they are literate just enough that they would need to solve problems on linux they wouldn’t have to on windows and their inability to solve problems on Linux make their experience bad.

          One level above that Linux is the better option again though.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      You can usually find the solution to Linux problems on the forum for your distro.

      With windows problems, the answer is usually “nothing can be done unless microsoft actually decides to fix it”. That’s after digging through 10 or more pages of search results filled with AI generated crap.

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, and I would like to add that if you really know what you’re doing, you can even fix complicated, deep-rooted problems by yourself.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        “nothing can be done unless microsoft actually decides to fix it”

        That is just a straight up lie

        I haven’t encountered a SINGLE issue like that in all my years of IT in heavy Microsoft environments. You can always find a solution, albeit having some small caveats like you have in every open source software. Every single issue is documented somewhere since 80% of desktops run it. The community is just so much bigger. You can even straight up contact Microsoft directly if you encounter anything that hasn’t been encountered before.

        Don’t blame your lack of Google fu on Microsoft just because you don’t like their design philosophy.

        • Moorshou@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would say so far, I can find the solutions just like i can with Microsoft, i can even leverage it with AI to get my problems solved. and actually, in linux mint, they have a irc and forum i can contact from my desktop.

  • NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I actually switched back to Windows a few weeks ago because I was so tired of all the NVIDIA problems I had on Wayland. A few days later I read that explicit sync finally got merged, lol.

    I’m definitely planning on switching back to Linux, but I’m not sure if I’ll do it before getting a new AMD GPU.

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “Fact: 95% of Linux users switched back to Windows95 right before all their problems are about to be fixed” A.D. 1999

    • Seriously though a few years ago Microsoft launched their own Linux distributions. You’d think it would be smooth sailing now, no ?
    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Only dual boot two Linux partitions. Dual booting windows is a waste of disk space, and liable to fuck with your bootloader every update.

      • BroChiMinh
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Dual booting windows is a waste of disk space

        There, fixed that for you.

  • Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Ok so I am probably gonna curse in the Linux church but please enlighten me

    I have one laptop with windows 10 for the simple stuff: internet, movie, ms office. It functions perfectly. Yes it needs a reboot sometimes. I don’t understand what people are saying about how terrible ms in regard for easy users.

    I mean I get it that it probably using my data, which would be actually enough to change.

    However: all these post about how easy it is to fix stuff in Linux (and thus saying it is not working properly)… Keeps me in ms.

    What are you guys doing that needs so much tinkering that needs to be fixed constantly?

    • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      me?

      okay so sometimes you need to run a twenty year old game made for another OS or cpu architecture

      which… weirdly, easier in Linux than win7; Linux has better backward compatibility with windows than windows. was like three clicks to install.

      but sometimes that game uses broadcast UDP packets for LAN multiplayer.

      and this is where our problem comes from, because broadcast UDP packets are deprecated, and also most modern routers don’t love them, I don’t think.

      so, I needed to find a way to manually readdress outgoing UDP packets from broadcast to a specific set of multicast addresses, which…

      also, some issues running USB as serial for some exotic peripherals. and by ‘exotic’ I mean ‘I don’t know for sure the PC is the problem; I might have soldered this wrong’.

      also some issues in qubes, but that’s literally all virtualization, and not a distro for anyone who hasn’t both been using Linux for a while and considered the cost of making their apartment a Faraday cage.

      a few issues with bare arch, which is the ‘do everything from scratch 0 automation bleeding edge tech nerd, no, seriously you need to manually download a file system’ distro. don’t use arch if you don’t know what youre doing.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        For the UDP broadcast, you should be able to catch and change them with simple firewall rules, you’d catch packets with a destination address of the broadcast address and send them to a chain that rewrites the destination

      • Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ok cool, so you do very specific things (and I lost you at UDP). So since I don’t have a very specific use case, I am sadly still not convinced that I need to switch

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          no I’m saying weirdshit that made me fudge things in Linux. and I could. it was easy.

          in windows my issues were all ‘this isn’t supposed to work, this isn’t allowed’ and I had to fight the system rather than finding the right config file and changing a couple lines.

          so my windows problems were much simpler shit. things like getting the taskbar to to what I want, or getting windows to not explode on top edge of screen (literally a checkbox in KDE plasma)

    • monkeyman512@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      A lot of the people who are drawn to Linux want to be able to tinker with things. For your use case you would probably be perfectly happy with installing Ubuntu, getting the apps you need, then not messing with it.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t really have to fix anything in Linux, I do a lot of advanced things though (I’m a software dev) where I will manually change executables’ paths, swap them out with symlinks, use custom newer GCC compilers, etc, but even with all of that I still rarely ever have to “fix” anything. I have been waiting, prepared, for when this Ubuntu install craps out so I can finally wipe it out and switch to Arch for this PC… but it still keeps going and going without a hiccup.

      I’m not sure what people are referring to that they have to fix all the time, but no two people have the same experience overall obviously, and there are so many variations of a linux system. like take 10 different desktop environments or window managers or different pieces of software or hardware and every permutation is going to have either more problems, or less problems.

      Ultimately I would recommend anybody just giving all of the distros and DE/WMs a try. A good try, give it a few weeks and see how each of them feel, you’re not going to know what you’ve been missing, or if anything ever has bugs or quirks at all period, until you do.

    • sag@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You don’t need to tinker so much Linux if you are just gonna use it for Internet and Movie stuff. We tinker with it so much because we want to make our desktop the way we want it

    • Moorshou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly? I fixed windows as much as i do linux

      I just web surf and play video games on my machines, I had to open terminal once to install printer drivers, the printers a MFC-490CW otherwise, nothing needed to be fixed

      It’s just nice to HAVE the terminal, lets me go under the hood of my computer if need be.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In windows you can’t fix it. You leave it there. In linux you can fix, you may try to fix it.

      Also the real issue to fix must be at install time for drivers. You wouldn’t face that in windows since the devices are preinstalled and configured by manufacturer. If something doesn’t work on windows it would be called manufacturer’s fault and not windows’ fault, so manufacturers make sure its working correctly

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It already just works in linux. But what people constantly want to “fix” is not fixable in windows. If you don’t need that, you still can use linux without so called “fixing”

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re talking about Mac, if something is wrong there like an app being too old, you can’t do anything about it.

        Windows allows you to mold it to make it do what you like, but usually the default setup is pretty decent. Even if it can be the manufacturers fault, you can still install older versions of drivers, install open source third party drivers, or compile your own if you are so inclined.

        The database that comes with Windows is to make it easy for the user, so they don’t have to go around searching for drivers when they attach a new device. Most of the time it works flawless.

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Windows allows, yes. But its difficult imo. Its not open and configurable so you have to do hacks if you want to place taskbar vertical or somethin. Then it becomes unstable and i guess that has a chance to get reverted with an update