• huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Use biometrics - just know the tools at your disposal to lockdown your phone.

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biometrics are ease of access, not security.  They make it easy for you (and low skilled strong arm attackers, skilled hackers, nation state actors, and neo-Nazi police state border and police thugs) to unlock your phone.  As long as you’re good with making it easy for them to unlock your phone by all means, use biometrics.

        Using biometrics to provide access to personal data is asinine.

        Using biometrics to provide access to any amount of sensitive data is criminally negligent.

        Biometrics cannot be changed.  Once you’ve given your palm biometrics, or facial biometrics, or fingerprints, or iris or retinal scans, or facial biometrics to any company or government they are no longer useful.

        Just as the 5.6 million people whose fingerprints were lost in the OPM hack in 2015.

        But whatever…you do you.  If you want to make it easy for people to access your device, go ahead and use biometrics.

        • Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          It takes one button press and one tap to disable biometrics on my phone at which point it reverts to a strong password.

            • Daxtron2@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Lol if it takes until there’s literal handcuffs on you, you’re a little physically challenged. Not to mention the phone will auto lockdown after 24hrs. There’s also nothing stopping you from initiating the lockdown if they were at the point of forcing you to open it.

      • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I use tasker to put my phone in lockdown mode whenever it senses a sharp tap (acceleration change) or Bluetooth disconnects. I figure that if I get pulled from my car or slammed to the ground, I’m going to want to require a PIN, password, or pattern to unlock. A quick tap on my pocket or just setting it down too aggressively does the same.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tasker is great for that. I also love the “send a keyword and tasker will text back with current GPS location” feature.

          • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Mine is send a key word and tasker sets an alarm one minute from now. Although I have a whole list of keywords I can use, including for GPS location, that one is far and away the one I use the most.

            Mostly because if my phone is on silent the alarm will still ring

    • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      So… show your PIN to everybody around you? Or should everybody type in a full blown password to just unlock their phone?

        • 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Along with the ability to disable the PIN button press visual feedback. Stock Android makes it super obvious what you’re typing in.

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Biometrics are ease of access, not security.  They make it easy for you (and low skilled strong arm attackers, skilled hackers, nation state actors, and neo-Nazi police state border and police thugs) to unlock your phone.  As long as you’re good with making it easy for them to unlock your phone by all means, use biometrics.

        Using biometrics to provide access to personal data is asinine.

        Using biometrics to provide access to any amount of sensitive data is criminally negligent.

        Biometrics cannot be changed.  Once you’ve given your palm biometrics, or facial biometrics, or fingerprints, or iris or retinal scans, or facial biometrics to any company or government they are no longer useful.

        Just as the 5.6 million people whose fingerprints were lost in the OPM hack in 2015.

        But whatever…you do you.  If you want to make it easy for people to access your device, go ahead and use biometrics.

      • TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Draw a pattern with the dots? There’s several ways to protect your privacy and thumbprints are by far one of the laziest and easiest to exploit options available

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is no different than them trying to say that any time you’re arrested, you have to unlock the front door to your house and let them search the place without cause, reason, or warrant. We know this. They know this. But since both political parties want a surveillance police State, that’s what we’ll get. It’s not like we ever get to vote on this stuff. We can only vote for a couple of people that share the exact same viewpoint on these matters, and then those people can do whatever tf they want.

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s like that except fo the fact that ut us not at all like that.

    It is forcing someone to grant access to information that requires a search warrant.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      They know this. They don’t care. They decided to treat digital life as its own separate thing 20 years ago, a thing that they can violate all laws on, despite clear analogous real life equivalents from which to form precedent.

  • SkabySkalywag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Wish I could set one specific finger -like the ring finger - assigned to load a empty/fake partition for the OS. Kinda like a briefcase with a secret compartment when you open it a certain way.

    Edit: looks like some one in the comments already had the same idea:)

  • xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    The solution is so obvious that I suspect a conspiracy. Just allow OTHER actions to be performed based on the finger used. Maybe it’s unlock, maybe it’s power-off, maybe siren, maybe factory-reset.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve been looking forever for an android ROM that does this. Base it on fingerprints and pins.

      Surprised no one has used it to streamline multiple profiles for shared devices either.

  • ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Exactly why I refuse to use biometrics. I like exercising my constitutional rights, especially in this age when they’re constantly trying to restrict our rights.

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    They’ve already captured you, which means they’ve captured your brain, which means they’ve captured your passwords and location of any keys. Therefore they can force you to unlock anything they want. /S

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s the thing. You don’t have to give the password, but under this you will be forced to give the “fingerprint” or face consequences.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I understood. I was using satire to apply the same justifications to passwords and keys, which currently are protected, afaict.